09-18-2003, 09:44 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,790
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CtrlAltDel
Well that's not simply true. ATI cards just handle DX9 better than FX cards which simply must take DX8.1 (or 8.0) routes to perform reasonably. I'm not trying to start yet another NVidia vs. ATI war here, as I've owned a pile of NVidia products and I've been satisfied with every one of them, only the FX line blows as somethings gone terribly wrong with their DX9 implementations.
CtrlAltDel
|
Then explain to me my Aquamark score? It tests all the latest DX9 shaders...if you ask me that's pretty good for a baseline run....
Read this thread....may be worth something.
http://www.nvplanet.com/forums/index...t=0&#entry2553
Aquamark 3 is supposed to be the benchmark that was going to make or break Nvidia and DX9 after the recent results with Half-Life 2. Looks like my NV35 passes with flying colors. :cool:
__________________
FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]
|
|
|