TweakTown

   
  Home
Shopping   
              Audio Reviews Casing & Cooling Reviews CPU & Chipset Reviews Digital Lounge Guides Memory Reviews Mobile Reviews Motherboard Reviews Networking Reviews Software Reviews Storage Reviews Visual Reviews




Old 07-13-2007, 10:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
atocp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: out there
Posts: 5
Default intel quad core?

I was wondering if anyone has any insight into Intel creating an upgrade to their quad-core series of processors. When they created the Pentium D dual core using the FSB for communication, they were incredibly slow, but by creating the shared L2 cache for communication, they went around any latency problems. The quad core relies on FSB for communication between dies and therefore the speed increases are not as huge relative to what you would expect (an overclocked E6700 does almost as good in many tests).
Does anyone know of any roadmap, news, 'insider knowledge' of Intel creating a new communication route instead of the FSB which would speed up the latency issues with the new quad cores? Coz i really dont want to fork out several hundred pounds for a new quad core (which would last me a few years, to have a better version of the same model come out soon. im willing to wait even up to a year for the better version!

cheers for any help,
atocp
__________________
Current Rig:

AMD Sempron 733MHz
Asus Toaster Circuit Board
128Mb OCZ PC240 (1996 Alzheimers Series)
550W Renault Clio Car Battery
Cardboard Box (Lined With Foil!)
500Mb 2500RPM HDD
Pioneer DVD Player (Stolen)
42" HD-Monitor (Again, Stolen)
atocp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 01:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
Default Re: intel quad core?

If you're willing to wait, Intel is supposed to release their Nehalem processor in the 2nd half of 2008 after Pynryn. This processor will have the memory controller on the die with the processor, similar to what AMD does with their processors. This helped the athlon 64 reduce latency, so it should help Nehalem as well. Do a search for Nehalem and you should be able to find alot more info and a roadmap.
jwlangs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2007, 02:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Yawgm0th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota, United States
Posts: 4,544
Send a message via AIM to Yawgm0th Send a message via MSN to Yawgm0th
Default Re: intel quad core?

Indeed, Nehalem is supposed to have an on-die controller.

That said, it's not worth waiting for. The on-die memory controller and hypertransport are not the only things the K8 line has going for it that made it beat out Netburst, and the FSB was not Netburst's real problem.

The entire line of P6-based processors -- from the Pentium 3 up to Core 2 Duo -- all use an FSB and all of them have performed incredibly well. Core 2 still does great with an FSB. Front-side bus is not such a problem that you should let it prevent you from going quad-core. The fact is, Core 2 Quad is great. It scales very well and has good clock speeds for being quad-core. I'd wait for the July 22nd price drops, and from then on Quad-Core is the way to go.
Yawgm0th is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 12:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0