Re: GA-X58A-UD5 (rev. 1.0)
I don't think I care to get up to that range. 4.0 GHz was always good in the past. I wanted to get to 4.2 just for the look of it, to see that huge number :) but I never managed. It doesn't make much difference though.
EDIT: I've managed to get 100% stable at 4.01 GHz (191x21) which was my old overclock. I had increased voltages to try to reach 4.20 (200x21) GHz, and when I bumped back to 4.01, I left them for the sake of stability. As I creep them back, I am getting a better picture for what my core needs.
My VID is about 1.256V. I know I need about 1.300V to get 4.01 GHz. Instead of using LLC like I used to, now I'm DVID to bring my VCORE up to slightly above 1.300V just in case the CPU wants some extra juice.
My next project will be maximizing the performance of the QPI, VTT, MCH and ICH. I've been playing around with RAM timings too:
@ 1528 9-9-9-24 1N, 1.54V I am stable, zero memory errors.
@ 1600 9-9-9-24 1N, 1.6V I think I am stable too but my CPU can't handle the 200 MHz FSB.
@ 1528 7-7-7-20 1N 1.6V I get memory errors but no bluescreens or other windows problems. Not using this setting.
@ 1528 8-8-8-24 1N 1.62V I still get memory errors but no bluescreens....
so I'm back down to the first one, and now I'm creeping my VRAM back down toward 1.50V to see if I can get there.
If anyone has any advice on better RAM timings I could try, I'm open to suggestion.
Last edited by Kaishi; 09-18-2010 at 12:12 AM.
If you give a girl a computer, she's going to ask for a video card. When you give her the video card, she'll ask for a steam account...
Bookmarks