Winrar Benchmark tool (V. 4.00 Beta 3 x64 used)
This test compresses data, but is affected by other hardware, and will be used as a general comparison in the results below. At the following link you can find more information about this tool, one way to use it, what hardware it tests and what affects it.
WinRAR Compression Test
WinRAR download and support. WinRAR is a powerful Windows tool to compress and decompress zip, rar and many other formats: Download now
LinX 0.6.4
THE hot one, this tests and measures (In GFlops) your CPU and memory floating point computing power using Intel's LinPack Binaries with linear algebra. Many users consider this program to be a standard of stability, however, often you may see my advice against the use of it in long or large period runs. This program is very hard on systems, and may overheat the CPU, or push it into extremes it would not otherwise see, and can cause unintended permanent damage or degradation. My advice on this program is to use it sparingly, as you will see I only use 10x passes for this review. There are other less harmful ways to test for stability such as Prime95 and HCI Memtest.
LinX - A simple Linpack interface - XtremeSystems Forums
Intel® Math Kernel Library
Other thoughts before getting to the main results:
For those of you that read my last review on the Mushkin Ridgebacks, you may know why I used two processors for this review. For anyone who hasn't had a chance to read that review be sure to take a look now as it is a great read, however, this is the reason why I used 2 CPU's. I use 2 different processors for X58 reviews now because of the bandwidth differences, overall memory speeds, and various performances allotted between the two. This does increase the time period to complete a review, due to the multiple ranges of tests I use, but the use of two processors is necessary due to the vast differences in the way each CPU affects memory as a whole.
While the hexa-core 980X is a great CPU for many reasons, it would only be fair to the memory itself, and to you my readers, if I also performed testing using a quad-core 965 CPU. The 980X does have some huge advantages over the previous generation i7's (920-975), but this comes at a cost, which is part of the reason I choose to test using both types. The quad core i7's have a jump on the 970-990X in memory bandwidth performance, depending on settings used this can range from 4% to 15% or more, but that is where it all ends for these CPU's. Putting memory bandwidth aside, the 970-990X can make massive leaps in raw MHz over the quads, due to the uncore allotments.
The massive memory frequencies the hexa-core CPU's can achieve are staggering in comparison to what the latter gen. quads can offer. I was able to reach an outstanding 3025.8Mhz @ 9-12-9-31 using these Radioactives and a P55 setup, but we'll get into that later towards the end of the review.
Testing Setup
Hardware used in tests:
GIGABYTE GA-X58A-UD7 1366 Motherboard
GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD7 1155 Motherboard
GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD4 1155 Motherboard
Intel i7-965 EX ES Quad-Core CPU
Intel i7-980X EX ES Hexa-Core CPU
Intel i5-2500K Quad-Core CPU
Mushkin Radioactive 998966 6GB 20000Mhz (PC3-16000) 8-10-8-27 Triple Channel DDR3 Memory Kit
Crucial RealSSD C300 128GB SSD
GIGABYTE 5870 SOC GV-R587SO-1GD 1GB Graphics Card
Ultra X3 ULT40312 850W Power Supply
The Mushkin Ridgebacks come pre-programmed with XMP settings for use in non-overclocking situations, here are the SPD/XMP programmed settings.
Benchmark and Testing Results:
Keeping the CPU speed at the same range for all tests was not possible, but I was able to keep the speeds the same for much of the comparisons between the two processors. Uncore was kept in the 4Ghz range this time around. Memory voltage was kept within 1.6-1.728 actual, depending on what timings and speeds were used. More voltage is not always the key to pushing these modules, higher speeds often do require it, but when trying tighter timings you will often find that a lower voltage helps more often than an increase in voltage.
The following are the CPU and memory speeds for each test, and my testing result images. Images are presented in the same order as the text list from L to R, top to bottom
965 EX:
![]()
![]()
![]()
4Ghz CPU - 1600Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 5-8-5-20 {Ram Voltage: 1.728V}
4.176GHz CPU - 2000Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 6-9-6-24 {Ram Voltage: 1.648V}
4.176GHz CPU - 2000Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 7-9-7-24 {Ram Voltage: 1.648V}
4.176GHz CPU - 2000Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 8-10-8-27 (Stock Spec) {Ram Voltage: 1.648V - Unaware they could run stock at 1.6V until later}
980X EX:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
4Ghz CPU - 1600Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 5-8-5-20 {Ram Voltage: 1.728V}
4.176GHz CPU - 2000Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 6-9-7-24 {Ram Voltage: 1.648V}
4.176GHz CPU - 2000Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 7-9-7-24 {Ram Voltage: 1.648V}
4.176GHz CPU - 2000Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 8-10-8-27 (Stock Spec) {Ram Voltage: 1.60V }
4.247Ghz CPU - 2200Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 8-10-8-27 {Ram Voltage: 1.648V}
4Ghz CPU - 2240Mhz 4Ghz Uncore 8-11-8-26 {Ram Voltage: 1.680V}
CAS 5 at 1600MHz was a total surprise, this is almost unheard of at these speeds. It is also very remarkable to see them being able to run 6-9-6-24 at 2000MHz, since they are rated at a much looser timing for those speeds.
Needless to say this kit has been very impressive in many ways, I am inspired each time I hear that Mushkin has a new product as they never fail to deliver!
965 EX Results:
AIDA64 v1.50.1236 Bandwidth
The tighter timings at 2000Mhz show to perform better in these read and copy results, writes are fairly even across the board no matter the timings or speed. The 1600Mhz CAS 5 results may have been better had the CPU speeds been even.
MaxxMEM², AIDA64, & RightMark Latency
Not much to see here, but again the tigher timings at 2000MHz are leading by a small margin.
MaxxMEM² Preview V. 1.82 Memory Score
Again the 1600MHz results may be lower due to the CPU speeds used during those tests, so this may not be such a fair comparison, but clearly again the winner is the lower timings at high speeds.
RightMark Memory Analyzer V. 3.80
Real Bandwidth Read-Write (Synthetic Test)
Fairly even across the board here, but the tighter timings again take the lead.
Real Bandwidth Maximal (Performance Test)
Clearly the 1600Mhz tests should have been run in a different manner, but it's difficult to keep all speeds the same (CPU, Uncore, and memory) while being able to maintain stability. The tighter C6 and C7 timings at 2000Mhz come out ahead again, making me seriously doubt my results for CAS 5 across the board, but I'll have to re-test those again at a later date to be sure.
Winrar Benchmark Tool V. 4.00
I was unsure how to graph both of these results at the same time, so please don't laugh at my lack of Excel skills.
Interestingly, the 1600MHz CAS 5 isn't too far behind the others in these results, but the winner is CAS 7 at 2000MHz.
980X EX Results:
AIDA64 v1.50.1236 Bandwidth
Ahh, these results are more in line with what I expect to see at various speed and timings. CAS 6 and 7 take the lead in copy, along with CAS 8 in write, but the leader in read speeds here is the highest speed tested - 2240MHz CAS 8 even though the CPU speed is slower.
MaxxMEM², AIDA64, & RightMark Latency
As seen previously in the 965 results, the winner here is the CAS 6 & 7, though all results are VERY close.
MaxxMEM² Preview V. 1.82 Memory Score
Slower CPU speeds of 4GHz may be causing the top and bottom results to be skewed a little here, CPU speed does greatly affect this benchmark even though it is named MaxxMEM. Yet again the 2000MHz CAS 6 & 7 prove to be the stronger performers.
RightMark Memory Analyzer V. 3.80
Real Bandwidth Read-Write (Synthetic Test)
Only 1500MB/s or so between the leader and slowest results here, but the 2240Mhz speeds come out on top.
Real Bandwidth Maximal (Performance Test)
The higher memory speed takes a large lead in this test, with 2000MHz CAS 6 & 7 not falling far behind.
Winrar Benchmark Tool V. 4.00
Ha, sorry! Again, please don't mind my lack of Excel skills.
All results are very close, not much to carry on about here... So moving right along.
P67 Dual Channel Testing:
Over the past month or two since P67's release I have been collecting data for reviews on those boards, so I knew it would be great to also include some testing results from Intel's new flagship chipset using these modules.
This kit was very happy to meet the P67 platform, and the results are quite impressive! I ran my usual gambit of tests which you can view the results of below. The results below I gathered specifically for this review, and I covered both lower speed and lower voltage, and high speed with stock voltage to a bit more. Memory speeds and timings on P67 depend a lot on the CPU you happen to have, one of the 2500K's I have is able to run 2133Mhz with stock QPI/Vtt voltage, while the other requires 1.2V or above to run those speeds. Each CPU also has it's own likes and dislikes when it comes to timings at certain speeds as well, so what frequencies and timings you end up with on P67 using any kit can be very dependent upon the CPU you are using.
There will not be any graphs for these results, otherwise this review would go on forever, so please click to view if you wish.
GA-P67A-UD4
5GHz CPU - 1600MHz - 5-7-5-20 @ 1.548V
5GHz CPU - 1600MHz - 6-8-6-20 @ 1.464V
![]()
GA-P67A-UD7
5GHz CPU - 2133MHz - 7-10-7-24 @ 1.716V
5GHz CPU - 2133MHz - 8-10-8-24 @ 1.644V
![]()
Also, if you are really interested in how these perform on P67 motherboards, please see the following two motherboard reviews as this kit was used for the entirity of each review.
GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD7 Motherboard Review
GIGABYTE GA-P67A-UD4 Motherboard Review
Notable Impressive Timings & Voltages:
1333MHz - 5-6-5-15 @ 1.568V
1600MHz - 5-7-5-18 @ 1.712V
1600MHz - 6-7-6-18 @ 1.536V
1600MHz - 7-7-7-18 @ 1.504V
These were done on GA-X58-UD7 and none of these CPU-z images showing impressive timings and speeds at low voltages were tested for stability, they are simply impressive boot-able frequencies with very nice timings. I was able to bench a few programs with these, but did not do any stability testing or save any results as I didn't think they should be included in this review unless fully tested and proven stable. Enjoy!



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

































Reply With Quote



































Bookmarks