512 KB block size normally will give you your best performance size.
I have the followings:
MB: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5
CPU: i7 920
Mem: Corsair TR3X6G1600C8D Dominator 6 GB@1600
HDD: 1 X Seagate 1.5 TB (win7-64 boot drive) & 2 X 2TB Hitachi in RAID0
I want to optimize the raid0 array as storage for Windows Media Center HDTV recordings and for HD video processing (e.g., mpeg-2 -> mpeg-4 transcoding, etc.).
What is would be best for the RAID 0 stripe size? (128K is default)
What would be optimum for the RAID 0 format block size?
Last edited by gigabyter; 11-08-2009 at 02:14 AM.
512 KB block size normally will give you your best performance size.
Phenom II 945 @ 3.2Ghz w/Thermaltake Big Typhoon Pro 14 CPU Cooler
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H rev.1.1 F11
Sapphire 3870HD / 100225L / 512MB / ddr4
4GB / Kingston / KHX8500D2K2/2GN / 5-5-5-18 / 1066Mhz
(2) WD Caviar / WD2500AAKS/ 250GB in SATA RAID-0
(1) WD Caviar / WD2500AAKS/ 250GB in SATA AHCI
(2) IDE's 1 8XdualDVDRW 1 52x32x52x CDRW
Antec /Neo HE550 / 550W
Mid size ATX case with show through panel
2) 80x80 front fans (1) 120x120 rear fan and small nb fan
Microsoft comfort curve USB keyboard 2000 ver.1.0
Logitech G500 USB mouse
7.1+2 Channel High Definition ALC889A
Dual boot Windows 7 32bit home & Windows 7 64bit home
RAID 0 is not fault tolerant so do you backups.
Stripe size of 64KB for the RAID controller is best for most users. 128KB is for SQL databases or arrays that have very large files as the majority. You will find the majority of your files on a normal computer are 32-64Kb.
In Windows for the format in NTFS, 512 bytes is optimal.
This will give your stripe 128 x 512 byte blocks = 64 KB.
what is it means? Is raid0 more dangerous then two HDs without raid? i am new into this concept, i have 1 tb hd and want to buy 1 more (same) too. while i was searching i found something called raid :)RAID 0 is not fault tolerant so do you backups.
i am a home user, i play games and have a movies database for my own but i can understand what is going on around the pc. If a make a raid0 setup for my 2x1tb HDs will i have disadvantages? Or can you say that i don't even need raid0 for those?
(btw i am using windows 7 64 bit, ex58ud5, i7 920, 1 tb 7200rpm WDC caviar black.)
Sorry for neverending questions and grammer mistakes if i had any.
RAID 0 rate of failure increases (N-1)/N. Two drive increased the failure rate by 50%. One drive fails, cable comes loose, power sags on one drive. You lose your RAID array and data.
How do you backup 2 TB?
as i understand:
i have A,B,C datas on my HD.
with out raid0. If the any part of A data on hd takes damage i lose A data. HD can't read it but i can use the B and C.
with raid0 my datas will be like A1,A2,B1,B2,C1,C2
if a drive takes damage including A1 and B2 (for example) i can't use A and B data right? One error doesn't destroy all?
if i am right with these. if i have 1 drive the chance of getting an error is "x". If i have 2 it will be like "2x" ? Because both of them can be damaged and they depend on each other?
And if 1 HD dies for some reason it will kill the other HD as well. They are like siamese twins?
One fatal error in RAID 0 means you have to format the drives and mirror over your backups, you cannot use one disk from a RAID 0 array without all the others. One error will not kill the other disk, but the date will be un-usable.
You are thinking of RAID 1, if one of those die you will still be able to get the data from the other disk, or install a new disk to mirror the other disk on to.
~ X58 BCLK WORLD RECORD ~
~ <Mushkin Enhanced Alpha Team ~
* BIOS Templates (Give Us Your Settings Please) *
GIGABYTE Reviews - X58A-OC ~ P67A-UD7 ~ P67A-UD4 ~ 5870 SOC
<Mushkin Reviews - 998966 Radioactive ~ 998826 Ridgeback ~ 998679 Blackline ~ 996587 HP
Crucial Reviews - C300 SSD ~ Blue Tracer DDR3 ~ Ballistix DDR2
X58 BIOS LED Debug Codes
RAID levels are complex.
To be honest it's not going to be such an impossible job to backup a 2TB RAID0 array. Why? Because nobody on earth as a mainstream user RAID 0's two drives then immediately fills them to capacity. There's also nothing stopping people from adding to their backup drives when necessary. A tip is not to buy 2TB drives, but get 2 1TB drives. In fact, for the price of a single 2TB WD Caviar Black, you can buy 4 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3's. I'd also avoid low power drives eg WD Caviar Green unless using in a USB/Firewire caddy where the interface is the bottle neck.
At the very minimum, I recommend people have at least 50% the RAID0 space available on a third drive as backup space. You can then either image with compression or simply copy over with compression. You're probably not going to be able to compress 2TB of data into 1TB of space but how often will you actually have 2TB of stuff to backup?
DVD's can also supplement your backup process. If authoring full quality 1080p content then a Blu-Ray drive may also be of use to you.
For the best of both worlds, a 4 drive RAID 1+0 (RAID 10) array would give a set and forget solution. A nested setup like this includes a RAID 1 array and within this a RAID 0 Array. This does mean that although two drives can be used, you'll see no performance improvement unless you configure 4 drives together.
Like Lsdmeasap says, you can have a RAID 0 array of 8 drives. If one drive fails, all your data will be lost. Everything. With a Raid 1 two drive setup for example, if one drive fails, all the data is already on the second drive which on most controllers should be usable right away. You can then replace the failed drive and re-build the mirror. Other RAID systems use parity spread across disks. This can mean that x number of drives can fail before the array is useless. If gotten to before the crucial number of drives fail, they can be replaced and the array rebuilt. Both a failed drive or the act of having to re-integrate a new drive to replace a failure can and usually does have a detrimental effect on the array (speed wise as well as security wise) until the rebuild is 100% complete.
For some light reading, not too detailed but enough to get started, read here: RAID - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Personally, for file creation that needs the speed of RAID 0 I'd use the RAID 0 to create the file(s0on, then immediately copy them over to my storage drive, maybe even a RAID 1 array for safekeeping. Don't risk what you can't afford to loose. People who don't back up will at some point, live to regret it, I assure you. It's happened to me. It only happened once though, one learns lessons quickly when 50 hours of work disappears in a screech of read/write heads hitting spinning metal.
EDIT: Just to add, the limit for stripe size on the ICH 10R is 128K. Go for that. Above this can only be achieved on add in cards on a P35/45/55, X38/48/58. Standard 4K allocation size will be fine. Large files may benefit a little from larger cluster sizes, but it's really not worth bothering with TBH.
Last edited by Psycho101; 12-01-2009 at 11:04 PM.
Coolermaster CM 690 II advance Case
Corsair HX750 (CWT, 91%(80+ Gold rated @230V) single 62A 12V rail
P55A-UD4 v2.0 @ F14
Core i5 760 @ 20 x 201, 4.02GHz
TRUE Black with a single Noctua NF-P12 pumping out 55 CFM @ 19db .
2 x 2GB Mushkin Ridgeback (996902), @ 7-10-8-27, 2010-DDR, 1.66v
2 x Gigabyte GTX 460 1024MB in SLI (Pre OC'd to 715MHz core and 1800MHz VRAM) @ 850 Core / 4100 Mem.
Intel X25-M Boot Drive (OS and Programs) 200MB/s Read & 90MB/s Write
Corsair X32 200MB/s Read & 100MB/s Write
WD Caviar Blue 640GB C (Steam, Games, Storage, Temp Files & Folders, etc)
Samsung F3 500GB Backup/Images
Noctua 1300RPM 19dB case fan (rear extraction)
3 x 140 MM Coolermaster LED fans (one front intake, one top extraction, one side intake)
Dell Ultra Sharp 2209WAf E-IPS @ 1680x1050
"People who don't back up will at some point, live to regret it, I assure you. It's happened to me."
Happened to me too. BUT the thing did run hard for over a year without an issue. Now I have an external drive.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)