I'm convinced you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about based on the chart on page 2. I'll just take the regular GeForce 6800 as an example:
For starters, the core and memory speeds aren't even close to right. Most come with a 325MHz core, though there are some factory-overclocked ones with 350 and 400MHz cores. The only card on that list that has a core speed of 500MHz or greater is the 6600GT, in fact. The only other one even above 400MHz is the Ultra... The 6800's memory clock should be 350MHz or 700MHz DDR, not 500MHz.
The memory is either 128MB DDR or 256MB GDDR3, though some come with 128MB GDDR3 and even with more memory then they're supposed to.
It should have 12 pixel pipelines, not 16. Only the GT and Ultra have 16.
It's a 256-bit card, not a 128-bit. The way you have it, it's much worse than a 6600GT...
The transitors are all messed up on almost every card, 6800 included...
Now the 6800 isn't the only card completely screwed up by that table, and it's really just sad that that table even got in there. Where exactly did you get all of this information?
For starters, the core and memory speeds aren't even close to right. Most come with a 325MHz core, though there are some factory-overclocked ones with 350 and 400MHz cores. The only card on that list that has a core speed of 500MHz or greater is the 6600GT, in fact. The only other one even above 400MHz is the Ultra... The 6800's memory clock should be 350MHz or 700MHz DDR, not 500MHz.
The memory is either 128MB DDR or 256MB GDDR3, though some come with 128MB GDDR3 and even with more memory then they're supposed to.
It should have 12 pixel pipelines, not 16. Only the GT and Ultra have 16.
It's a 256-bit card, not a 128-bit. The way you have it, it's much worse than a 6600GT...
The transitors are all messed up on almost every card, 6800 included...
Now the 6800 isn't the only card completely screwed up by that table, and it's really just sad that that table even got in there. Where exactly did you get all of this information?
Comment