Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: Time Travel?




  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Ballarat, VIC
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    As some of you know, I am a physics freak. So therefore I find this really interesting. This bloke thinks it is possible to perform time travel. All the details here:

    http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/09...inationP.shtml

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    6,297

    Default

    Maybe the page has travelled in time Slamo.....not found :?:

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Ballarat, VIC
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    Sorry, the forums won't parse the url properly. I fixed it, you're just gonna have to copy and past it into the address bar.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Ballarat, VIC
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE FORUMS!?!?!

    They are adding spaces in the address for some reason

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Ballarat, VIC
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    Here is the article:


    Professor's time travel idea fires up the imagination

    By David Abel, Globe Staff, 4/5/2002

    Ronald Mallett, a physicist at the University of Connecticut, believes he knows how to build a time machine - an actual device that could send something or someone from the future to the past, or vice versa.

    He's not joking.

    Unlike other physicists who have pondered the science of time travel, the 57-year-old professor has devised a machine he believes could transport anything from an atom to a person from one time to another.

    ''I'm not a nut. ... I hope to have a working mockup and start experiments this fall,'' says Mallett, who will detail his ideas about time travel tonight at Boston's Museum of Science. ''I would think I was a crackpot, too, if there weren't other colleagues I knew who were working on it. This isn't Ron Mallett's theory of matter; it's Einstein's theory of relativity. I'm not pulling things out of the known laws of physics.''

    But Alan Guth, a physics professor at MIT who has studied the theory of time machines, says he isn't sure it's even theoretically possible to travel through time. As far as whether time travel is a possibility, he says: ''Definitely not within our lifetimes.''

    Another physicist, Stanley Deser, a professor at Brandeis University who recently co-authored a paper titled ''Time Travel?,'' says the problem is not the physics, it's the feasibility of making time travel work. ''This is about trying to amass all the matter of the universe in a very small region,'' he says. ''Good luck.''

    After 27 years at UConn, Mallett has the confidence of his boss, William Stwalley, chairman of the university's physics department. ''His ideas certainly have merit,'' Stwalley says. ''I think some of his ideas are very interesting and they would make nice tests of general relativity.''

    Mallett's plan doesn't require some sort of sleigh, the means of transport in H.G. Wells's ''The Time Machine,'' or reaching 88 miles per hour in a flying DeLorean as in the movie ''Back to the Future.'' His time machine merely uses a ring of light.

    According to Einstein's theory of gravity, anything that has mass or energy distorts the space and the passage of time around it, like a bowling ball dropped on a trampoline. Circulating laser beams in the right way, by slowing them down and shooting them through anything from fiber-optic cable to special crystals, might create a similar distortion that could theoretically transport someone through different times, Mallett believes.

    The professor and his UConn colleagues plan to build a device to test whether it's possible to transport a subatomic particle, probably a neutron, through time. The energy from a rotating laser beam, Mallett hopes, would warp the space inside the ring of the light so that gravity forces the neutron to rotate sideways. With even more energy, it's possible, he believes, a second neutron would appear. The second particle would be the first one visiting itself from the future.

    While Mallett acknowledges that sending a person through time may require more energy than physicists today know how to harness, he sees it merely as ''an engineering problem.'' If it's possible to use light to send a neutron through time, a feat that doesn't require as much energy as sending a human, he believes it wouldn't be long before engineers figure out a way to send a person.

    ''What we're talking about is at the edge of current technology, not beyond current technology,'' he says.

    Since his father, a heavy smoker, died at the age of 33 when Mallett was 10 years old, Mallett has longed for a way to travel back in time to warn him about the dangers of cigarettes.

    For most of his career, however, Mallett kept secret that his desire for time travel had drawn him to become a physicist. It wasn't until a few years ago, when he began researching a book on the topic, that he arrived at his idea of how to build a time machine.

    If his idea pans out, won't there be a host of potential paradoxes, such as time travelers killing their parents and making it impossible for them to exist? No, he says, explaining that those travelers would continue to exist in a ''parallel universe.''

    And what about the ethics of changing history?

    There would be government laws to control time travel, he believes.

    ''Any technology has a potential nefarious side to it,'' he says. ''But I don't think there's a way to stop it. We as a species have always reached out. We've been doing that since the caves. I say let's make it so that we better reality. I think we can bravely do that.''

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    6,297

    Default

    thanks for posting it Slamo :thumb:

  7. #7
    Beefy Guest

    Default

    time travel is a load of crap. you could never go back in time. but it's still an interesting read. :D

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Ballarat, VIC
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    I first thought it was a load of crap but after reading it I beg to differ. The physics involved is spot on. The only problem is harnessing the power to be able to transport anything larger than a neutron.

    The main problem would be getting back to the furure as you'd be travelling back before the time that the machine was invented. That could create problems :eek:

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    6,297

    Default

    Hey if you meddled there may not be a future to come back to :(

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    4,723

    Default

    If going back in time were to be possible someday, how come I've never met anyone who has?
    The reason a diamond shines so brightly is because it has many facets which reflect light.

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •