Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 59 of 72 FirstFirst ... 949575859606169 ... LastLast
Results 581 to 590 of 715

Thread: 3DMark2001 SE scores




  1. #581

    Default

    Just cracked 13800 with modest overclocks on my graphics card and CPU.

    CPU = 11.5 x 166
    Graphics = Core 300.15 mem 315.

    See if I can get into the 14000's tonight.

  2. #582
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    Still struggling to get there but inching ever closer.......new score in sig...

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  3. #583
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    61

    Default

    way to go soulburner, how did u do it? is it the omega driver? Anyway, congrats, man
    [size=9If there's a pensieve fear, a wasted year, a man must learn to cope.
    If his obsession's real, suppression that he feels must turn to hope - DT

    rig:
    P4C800-Deluxe 2.8 C (+Vantec Aeroflow)
    Sapphire 9700 Pro
    4x256MB Kingston KVR400C25
    Audigy 2
    2x80GB Maxtor DM9 RAID 0
    Enermax 433W
    ALL AIR, no Vmod

    3DMark2001 = 20954
    3DMark2003 = 6038
    Sandra Mem = 6028/6018[/size]

  4. #584
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    Changed my RAM......the Corsair wouldn't run past 256fsb 5:4 cuz of some wierd divider issue, even though it would run 232mhz 1:1....

    The Kingston runs just fine but does not live up to my expectations.....its supposed to be able to run a lot faster, says everyone else that has it.

    That run was at 276 (3312mhz) 5:4 where the previous 18,625 was 256 5:4. I'll keep trying and see if it gains any from burn in.

    This CPU will now get to 3400-3500mhz but I can't get a 3DMark that high because its not stable, probably due to heat. I only have an Aeroflow on it...not bad for a $25 HSF though.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  5. #585
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    61

    Default

    yea, they'll get better over time and burn-ins. Anyway i was wondering, why did u get the 3200 instead of 3500? They cost almost the same (at newegg.com it's only 3 bucks different) and use the same chips, but of course the 3500 can reach higher fsb.

    Anyway, do u have active cooling on the NB? It should help. Without it I could only get 255 FSB to finish 3dmark, with it i got 263 (but the mem can't do 2-2-2-5 timing @ 263, so i ran it @ 260).
    Keep it coming man :cheers:
    [size=9If there's a pensieve fear, a wasted year, a man must learn to cope.
    If his obsession's real, suppression that he feels must turn to hope - DT

    rig:
    P4C800-Deluxe 2.8 C (+Vantec Aeroflow)
    Sapphire 9700 Pro
    4x256MB Kingston KVR400C25
    Audigy 2
    2x80GB Maxtor DM9 RAID 0
    Enermax 433W
    ALL AIR, no Vmod

    3DMark2001 = 20954
    3DMark2003 = 6038
    Sandra Mem = 6028/6018[/size]

  6. #586
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    I do not have active cooling on the NB but FSB is not my problem as I have reached 285 with the 3:2 divider.

    I am doing more ram testing now and they seem to be able to do 223 @ 2-2-3-5 now...i'll see how much I can get out of them.

    About the 3200...its a secret among overclockers...the HyperX 3500 sucks. The 3200 surpasses all other memory in speed and has reached 250mhz 2-2-2-5 with enough voltage. I was hoping for similar results but so far mine suck compared to everyone elses.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  7. #587
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    3971

    Abit KR7A-133 mainboard
    AMD Athlon XP1600 [1401MHz] processor
    Generic 512mb PC2100 DDR memory
    Hercules 3D Prophet II GTS 64mb DX7 graphics adaptor

  8. #588
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner
    As long as they keep raising the bar, macci will continue to fight them off with his P4 rig....and hes doing a damn good job too.....
    its wierd hearing names that are so fimilear at futuremark over here

    WETA do u have a compare link? i would like to see what u got in what tests...:rolleyes:
    |AXP2600+@2379|Ti4600|ASUS A7V8X|512mb CORSAIR3200XMS|
    |120gb MaxtorHD 8mb,7200rpm|19" Sony CRT;G420;1600x1200@85hz|

  9. #589
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    Macci broke 27k+ something with this new A64 FX rig.....I want to see him get his hands on a P4 EE and see what it can do. They have already shown large gains in 3DMark upwards of 2500 points. Add that onto his previous high score and it should beat the FX.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  10. #590
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    Rage710: Sorry but I didn't save it. I ran the benchmark again, this time I got 4097, but I couldn't save it because Futuremark's servers were down for maintenance.

Page 59 of 72 FirstFirst ... 949575859606169 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •