Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 3Dmark2001 results




  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    37

    Default

    What should I do to get better performance here? this system scored 11456 on 3Dmark 2001. My system got 4778 3D Marks on 3DMark03, 1024x768 resolution settings all around.
    Nothings overclocked.

    What should a system like this score anyway?
    P4 2.4 ghz CPU
    ATI Radeon 9800 pro
    512 2700 RAM
    Biostar USeries U8598 Mainboard
    160 GB Maxtor (8mb Buffer) Harddrive

    Anyone have something comparable so I know how this system stands up against other systems with close to the same specs?


    3DMark2001 Project Details
    Project Info
    Name



    Description


    Untitled
    Date


    2003-08-22 Published



    System Configuration
    Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

    DirectX Version 8.0



    Mobo Manufacturer

    Mobo Model P4X400-8235

    AGP Rates (Current/Available) N/A / N/A



    CPU Intel Pentium 4 2393 MHz

    FSB 133 MHz

    Memory 512 MB



    Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON 9800 PRO

    Driver Name RADEON 9800 PRO

    Driver Version 6.14.10.6368

    Video Memory 128 MB



    Program Version 3DMark2001 Original

    Resolution 1024x768 32bit

    Texture Format Compressed

    FSAA Disabled

    Z-Buffer Depth 24bit

    Frame Buffer Double

    Rendering Pipeline D3D Pure Hardware T&L



    Detailed Test Results
    3DMark Score 11456 3D marks



    Game 1 Car Chase - Low Detail 161.5 FPS

    Game 1 Car Chase - High Detail 51.4 FPS

    Game 2 Dragothic - Low Detail 189.3 FPS

    Game 2 Dragothic - High Detail 112.1 FPS

    Game 3 Lobby - Low Detail 147.2 FPS

    Game 3 Lobby - High Detail 65.4 FPS

    Game 4 Nature 95.0 FPS



    Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1843.7 MTexels/s

    Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2501.6 MTexels/s



    High Polygon Count (1 light) 62.4 MTriangels/s

    High Polygon Count (8 lights) 16.3 MTriangels/s



    Environment Bump Mapping 162.3 FPS

    DOT3 Bump Mapping 148.9 FPS



    Vertex Shader 159.2 FPS

    Pixel Shader 110.1 FPS

    Advanced Pixel Shader N/A



    Point Sprite 37.5 MSprites/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,393

    Default

    I get around 14000 for 3dmark01, and around 2000 for 3dmark03 because i don't have a direct9 card.
    CPU: Opteron 165 @ 311x9 - 2817.8 mhz - 1.47v
    Mobo: Abit KN8-SLI
    RAM: 2x512 Crucial Ballistic Tracers500 @ 202 mhz 2-2-2-5 T1
    GFX: Asus EAX1950pro @ 648/1408
    PSU: Thermaltake 500w
    SC: Audigy 2 zs
    LCD: 22' Samsung 225bw
    Speakers: Klipsch ProMedia 5.1 Ultra
    Mouse: Logitech G5

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    You should do at least 14k stock, mine did 14,800 on defaults on best image quality.

    Make sure your running properly (8x AGP, DX9.0b, new card drivers, etc).

    Your score is identical to my last system, stock 2.4b / Ti4400 / 11,600 so you have a lot of room for improvement.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner
    You should do at least 14k stock, mine did 14,800 on defaults on best image quality.

    Make sure your running properly (8x AGP, DX9.0b, new card drivers, etc).

    Your score is identical to my last system, stock 2.4b / Ti4400 / 11,600 so you have a lot of room for improvement.

    I have (8x AGP, DX9.0b, new card drivers, and not sure about the etc part). I only get in the 14k range when running 3DMark 2001 in 640X480. Any other suggestions to get to the 14k range in 1024X768 res?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    Run in performance mode.....dont bench with all your normal progs running....etc...common sense stuff.

    I would say performance mode was worth a good 750 points and benching in an ideal environment (nothing running) was worth another 500 points for me.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner
    Run in performance mode.....dont bench with all your normal progs running....etc...common sense stuff.

    I would say performance mode was worth a good 750 points and benching in an ideal environment (nothing running) was worth another 500 points for me.

    Performance mode... Whats that?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Whoever
    Performance mode... Whats that?
    As opposed to highest image quality...

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Biostar USeries U8598 Mainboard
    What chipset is that?

    ur nature score is in the hole...my ti4600 is 90...um, try getting latest chipset drivers, vid card drivers, make sure NO programs are running in taskbar, set all tabs in drivers to the left (performance) and that is all i can think of, i will post if i can think of mroe
    |AXP2600+@2379|Ti4600|ASUS A7V8X|512mb CORSAIR3200XMS|
    |120gb MaxtorHD 8mb,7200rpm|19" Sony CRT;G420;1600x1200@85hz|

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    33

    Default

    havnt done 03 yet but heres my system and score

    http://forums.tweaktown.com/showthre...?threadid=1074
    http://sigx.yuriy.net/images/xefloetry83.png
    AMD Athlon XP 2800 Barton
    FrozenCpu.com(Blizzard) Mid tower 2-120mm 2-80mm all voltages controlled
    Enlight 420W Dual Fan PSW
    Thermaltake Volcano 9
    Leadtek WinFast K7NCR18G-Pro nForce MB Dual DDR memory architecture
    2x256=512mb DDR Samsung 2700 333mhz bus
    GF4
    17inch LCD Pixo at700s
    logitech mx700 wireless
    40GB Western Digital "SE"
    30GB Maxtor 7200 ATA133

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    A 2.4c / 9800 Pro system like that should be scoring 20k easy. Your low Nature score leads me to believe your AGP may not be enabled.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •