Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 11 of 21 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 210

Thread: 3DMark05 Scores




  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Qld, Australia
    Posts
    525

    Default re:3DMark05



    squeezed a little more from mine
    E8600@ 4.25GHz~Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme~Foxconn Blackops~4GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1625 at 1700MHz (8-8-8-24-2N) 1.916v~Asus 9800GTX~18x Pioneer 212 DL SATA DVD-RW~320GB WD SATAII~Antec True Power Trio 650W~Thermaltake Soprano~Vista Ultimate x64 SP2/Win7 RC1

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19

    Default Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    Comp specs:
    athlon amd 64 3400+ oced
    eVGA 6800gt 256mb
    corsair xms 1g 2-3-3-10 t1

    SCORE: 4808

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,364

    Default Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    3D MARK5 FIVE SCORE:


    4695


    P4 2.8E PRESCOTT WITH ARCTIC FREEZER 4 COOLER @ 233FSB 3.26ghz
    MSI 865PE NEO2 MOBO
    ULTRA PC4000 DUAL CHANNEL 1GB RAM
    X800XL AGP 8X AT STOCK SPEEDS (IT'S ONLY 2 DAYS OLD)
    OCZ MODSTREAM 520W PSU
    HITACHI 80GB 7200RPM SATA
    WESTERN DIGITAL 80GB 7200RPM SATA
    NEC 3500AG DVD BURNER
    AND ABOUT 11 VARIOUS SIZE FANS KEEPING IT COOL
    IDLE TEMPS 25C AND FULL LOAD TEMPS AROUND 40C

    Very mild overclock with lots of headroom. Haven't started wxploring X800XL's speeds yet. Need to get better cooler before I try that.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Qld, Australia
    Posts
    525

    Default Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    as high as i can go, 461/1245

    5710 gotta be happy with that on air cooling
    Last edited by ANZAC_ELITE; 05-12-2005 at 06:53 AM.
    E8600@ 4.25GHz~Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme~Foxconn Blackops~4GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1625 at 1700MHz (8-8-8-24-2N) 1.916v~Asus 9800GTX~18x Pioneer 212 DL SATA DVD-RW~320GB WD SATAII~Antec True Power Trio 650W~Thermaltake Soprano~Vista Ultimate x64 SP2/Win7 RC1

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Qld, Australia
    Posts
    525

    Default Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    got a bit more, see sig, XG modded 76.50 driver is nice.
    E8600@ 4.25GHz~Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme~Foxconn Blackops~4GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1625 at 1700MHz (8-8-8-24-2N) 1.916v~Asus 9800GTX~18x Pioneer 212 DL SATA DVD-RW~320GB WD SATAII~Antec True Power Trio 650W~Thermaltake Soprano~Vista Ultimate x64 SP2/Win7 RC1

  6. #106

    Default Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    5233 on a Dell Inspiron XPS Gen2 laptop.

    P-M 2.0, 6800 Ultra, 1gig stick of PC2-4200

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    _
    Posts
    349

    Default Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    System in sig with CPU @ 2.4 and X800XT @ 540\1180 - 6025

  8. #108
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    Albatron K8X250Gb ,Amd 64 2800+ at 1.8ghz, 1 gig VDATA 400, Seagate 80gig,leadtek FX5900xt oc 450/850(bios flashed),winXP sp2

    score : 1182

    I would like to know if someone can tell me what is wrong with my score or is this normal? The thing is I have seen ppl with 9600xt's that get a better score on 2005 but I get better scores at almost every other bench(and more fps then the ati9600xt in games). I know a few other ppl with the same card but have the same low scores, is something else the matter?

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,525

    Default Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    Quote Originally Posted by Nether
    I would like to know if someone can tell me what is wrong with my score or is this normal? The thing is I have seen ppl with 9600xt's that get a better score on 2005 but I get better scores at almost every other bench(and more fps then the ati9600xt in games). I know a few other ppl with the same card but have the same low scores, is something else the matter?
    The XT in the ATi line means that its the top of that model range where as in the nVIDIA line XT means the bottom of the heap model (XT in nVIDIA means the same as SE in ATi, both are crippled and don't perform near as well as the "plain Jane" versions of those same models).
    Last edited by wayout44; 05-17-2005 at 08:29 PM.

  10. #110
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2

    Question Re: 3DMark05 Scores

    Quote Originally Posted by wayout44
    The XT in the ATi line means that its the top of that model range where as in the nVIDIA line XT means the bottom of the heap model (XT in nVIDIA means the same as SE in ATi, both are crippled and don't perform near as well as the "plain Jane" versions of those same models).
    This I know but how do you explain why my card still performs better?

    CS:source

    My card has a 256-bit mem interface, while the ati is only 128-bit.
    FX5900xt has 4x2 pipelines, 9600xt 4x1 pipeline

    I can clearly see the difference in CS:source(steam one) where I get 146,9 fps average on the video test while the 9600xt gets 91.3 average fps.

    The rig for the ati is: Amd 64 3000+ @ 2ghz ,512 jetram 3.2.2.6
    Score 1880
    Gigabyte 9600xt stock

    The scores for 3dmark2003 is :
    My card 9600xt
    6330 4125

    Does 2005 give a score on the quality of your picture/shaders? I know that the FX series have bad shader quality, maybe that is the problem?

Page 11 of 21 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •