Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 42 of 44 FirstFirst ... 324041424344 LastLast
Results 411 to 420 of 439

Thread: PC Mark 2002




  1. #411
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    You shouldn't need water cooling, I did it with a Vantec Aeroflow and its 3DMark stable...I just don't have enough volts to the memory so I can't run 5:4 past 280.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  2. #412
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fincastle, IN, USA
    Posts
    3,776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner
    You shouldn't need water cooling, I did it with a Vantec Aeroflow and its 3DMark stable...I just don't have enough volts to the memory so I can't run 5:4 past 280.
    I know, but I ran across a helluva deal on a water-cooling set-up (Check Cooling forum for details)

  3. #413

    Default

    here it is at 220mhz FSB, i dropped the mult a bit cuz i only wanted to see what the memory was getting, not a huge boost. but im dropping the fsb back to 200 cuz i dont need it this high atm. is there any way to get those kind of memory scores onan AMD? (im refering to soulburner with over 10k)

  4. #414
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fincastle, IN, USA
    Posts
    3,776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swinger
    here it is at 220mhz FSB, i dropped the mult a bit cuz i only wanted to see what the memory was getting, not a huge boost. but im dropping the fsb back to 200 cuz i dont need it this high atm. is there any way to get those kind of memory scores onan AMD? (im refering to soulburner with over 10k)
    You wont score that high with the memory on an AMD system

  5. #415
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swinger
    man are those intels real quick with the memory or what! see what u get when u can pay intel money. still love AMD tho cuz u cant beat their bang 4 buck. hey wiggo whats the v-core at on that p4?
    Actually the 2.4C's arn't that bad price wise and the mobo's and memory are similar in price to AMD setups. I'm runnin' 1.6v atm but once I really get into this ****ty BIOS setup and work it out better plus shut down those unnecessary services that arn't needed for benchtests then the scores should improve by quite at bit.

  6. #416
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fincastle, IN, USA
    Posts
    3,776

    Default

    258fsb, 5:4 divider, Memory timings now at 2-3-2-6


    10k memory score getting ever closer :D

    EDIT: CPU score went up upon re-running, new attachment

  7. #417
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    The only thing is that the memory score ain't goin' to help ya if the CPU and HDD score can't keep up.

  8. #418
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Fincastle, IN, USA
    Posts
    3,776

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggo
    The only thing is that the memory score ain't goin' to help ya if the CPU and HDD score can't keep up.
    My CPU score was a little low there, I dunno why. My RAM doesn't seem to agree with anything above 265fsb at 5:4, I may Volt mod my board, it only goes up to 2.8 vdimm.

    EDIT: I re-ran, attached new score above

  9. #419

    Default

    Actually the 2.4C's arn't that bad price wise and the mobo's and memory are similar in price to AMD setups. I'm runnin' 1.6v atm but once I really get into this ****ty BIOS setup and work it out better plus shut down those unnecessary services that arn't needed for benchtests then the scores should improve by quite at bit.
    ya in my opinion the 2.4C's are the best intel overall based on price, performance, overclocking, ect. im happy with my setup right now but in the future who knows which brand i'd go with.

  10. #420
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swinger
    here it is at 220mhz FSB, i dropped the mult a bit cuz i only wanted to see what the memory was getting, not a huge boost. but im dropping the fsb back to 200 cuz i dont need it this high atm. is there any way to get those kind of memory scores onan AMD? (im refering to soulburner with over 10k)
    You won't be able to hit those kind of numbers on AMD unless you are running an FX-51, they put up similar bandwidth numbers to Canterwood systems.

    My best is 10.5k on the memory but it said my CPU score was N/A...

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

Page 42 of 44 FirstFirst ... 324041424344 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •