Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 10 of 39 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 384

Thread: 3DMark03 scores




  1. #91
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9

    Default

    1752

    AMD Athlon XP @ 1733Mhz
    ASUS KTV7333 @ 133/40 (?)
    512MB DDR 2700
    Leadtek A250TD GeForce4Ti4400 128MB DDR OC @ 300/600

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    54

    Default

    When I run 3DMARK03 my system won't run the last sound test, the 60 sound test? On there website it says the my Soundblast Live doesn't support this but has been fixed through the latest drivers. I dled the drivers and installed them and it still doesn't run the last test? Any Suggestion? And... Am I losing points because the last test isn't performed? I ended up with
    My 3DMARK03 Score This is pretty good, right?

    -Hawks
    <center>| Processor: P4 2.4B OCed @ 3.2Ghz | MoBo: Albatron PX845PE Pro II |
    | OS: Windows XP Pro | RAM: OCZ 512MB PC3500 OCed @ 445 mhz |
    | Graphics: Radeon ATI 9700 Pro @ 395/345 | Temp: 32C normal, 35C full |
    | 3DMark2001: 18094 | 3DMARK03: 5763 | PCMARK02: Score |
    | Sound: SB Live 5.1 | Cooling: Thermaltake Volcano 7+ HSF |
    | PSU: Antec TrueBlue 480W | Mouse: Logitech MX300 |</center>

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    178

    AMD Athlon XP1600 [1401MHz] processor
    Abit KR7A-133 mainboard
    Generic 512mb PC2100 DDR memory
    Hercules 3D Prophet II GTS 64mb DX7 graphics adaptor

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    346

    Default

    hehe very nice weta :thumb: I think i should try running it on my sisters 1.3 Ghz celeron with a tnt2 :rofl:

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    Cheers mate :cry:, when I upgrade to a NV35 or a Hercules 3D Prophet 9800 Pro, then there should be a big improvement. I knew I'd get a crap score with a DX7 card, but I thought I'd post it anyway.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    240

    Default

    I saw someone on Rage3D get a whopping "4" on 3Dmark03 once, so, don't sweat it, Weta. :D Plus, it's such an unfair test of systems which still play games great, but lack the DX9 hardware support. IMHO! I like to see how machines play QuakeIII for a test, seems to be a fair test of system performance in my eyes. Cheers!
    - -+ r e v e n a n t +- -
    my rig: Shyznat
    * AMD XP 2600+ @2277 on an MSI K7N2-L * 2x 256meg Corsair PC3200 XMS Platinum in Dual Channel mode @ 3,2,1,2.0 * ATI Radeon 9700 Pro * 4x IBM 180GXP 60gig RAID 0+1 on a Promise Fastrack100 * 1x Western Digital WD800JB 80gig with 8mb buffer on mainboard IDE *Soundblaster Live! * Samsung SW-248B CDRW with 8mb buffer * Sony DDU1621 DVDR * Enermax EG465P-VE 431watt PSU * 23.1" Sceptre X23s-Naga LCD * Chieftech windowed case with glowing ide cables * pic1 * pic2 * pic3 * pic4 * pic5 * 9700 * 3Dmark03 5432 * 3Dmark2001SE 17K club member * the sweet spot *

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    Futuremark has released a software patch for its 3DMark03 benchmark suite. The patch provides support for Microsoft DirectX9.0a and incorporates enhanced features based on user feedback. Benchmark scores between the patched version and the original version will not change.

    This patch allows Anti-Aliasing (FSAA) and full frame pixel shader post-processing to be used simultaneously, provided DirectX 9.0a runtime has been installed. The professional version now also includes customization tools for different skins.


    Futuremark

  8. #98

    Default

    w0w 700 1337 f0r m3 or1()n


    g 888 w}{: m: g}{z 5m 400 ЮV:4.45 m }{ m 4 .4 5 Ю 400m}{z m m 婆 400 (}{ 4g 64 m [50/500m]) m|{ ......}{ g w }{}{??? w gg |{ 4-5f }{ ׀...߆w 宀 f }{ "gm" J f |{ ????

    Translated from GEEK:

    i got a 888 score with: equipement P3 1GHZ 512 RAM XP Pro SP1 TI4200 Drivers 43.45 my other system p4 2.4A 512ddr 400mhz ram same exact TI4200 (both 4xagp 64ram [250core/500ram]) 1311 3dmark score.......this test relly bogs down huh??? i was getting like 4-5 fps on both the boxes...btw are any of these "games" real or are they just FPS killer tests????

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    346

    Default

    essentially theyre just fps killer DX9 demos now, there aren't any games currently made that require DX9. Although I imagine Doom 3 will have graphics of similar or better quality than in Game tests 2 and 3 :drool: Damn i cant wait til that comes out :drool: :D

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    452

    Default

    Here are my scores:

    Default settings: 4587 marks!

    Overclocked settings: (core 364.50MHz and memory 330.75MHz) 4944 marks!

    Im so pissed up, because I didnt get over 5k! :steam: :rolleyes:

Page 10 of 39 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •