Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 21 of 39 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 384

Thread: 3DMark03 scores




  1. #201

    Default

    again, it looks like its my vid card holdin me back, the wings of fury test runs great but the others are like a slide show, 8fps sucks!

  2. #202
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    30

    Default

    I'm lookin at a score of 5063 with stock clocking on everything. Check sig for system.

    I got around 5 FPS a second for the CPU Test of the orge battle in the basement game, with the chick and the sword? I'm pleased with my score but I'm curious as to why my performance bottoms out on that test only and no where else.

    EDIT: Whoops! Forgot I didn't have my specs in my sig on this forum!

    P4 2.6C 800FSB w/HT
    1G Geil DDR400 2.5-3-3-6
    Powercolor 9700Pro (stock)
    Intel 875P MoBo
    XP Pro
    Pentium 4 2.6 800FSB w/HT - 1G Geil DDR400 2.5-3-3-6 - Intel 875P MoBo - Hitachi 80Gb SATA HDD - XP pro
    PowerColor 9700 Pro @ 355/652Mhz
    3DMark03: 5402
    AquaMark3 Tri-Score
    GFX: 5286
    CPU: 8723
    Overall: 40,575

  3. #203
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Workman1502
    I'm lookin at a score of 5063 with stock clocking on everything. Check sig for system.

    I got around 5 FPS a second for the CPU Test of the orge battle in the basement game, with the chick and the sword? I'm pleased with my score but I'm curious as to why my performance bottoms out on that test only and no where else.

    EDIT: Whoops! Forgot I didn't have my specs in my sig on this forum!

    P4 2.6C 800FSB w/HT
    1G Geil DDR400 2.5-3-3-6
    Powercolor 9700Pro (stock)
    Intel 875P MoBo
    XP Pro
    Well that high latency memory wouldn't help as 2-3-2-6 (or even 2-2-2-5 as shown here) though havin' an Intel mobo wouldn't help much either instead of havin' an i875 based mobo from a quality tier1 manufacturer. :shrug:

  4. #204
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    I never run the CPU tests anymore, but when I do they are really slow, its normal.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  5. #205
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    30

    Default

    New scores in sig after some OC'ing of my Radeon.
    Pentium 4 2.6 800FSB w/HT - 1G Geil DDR400 2.5-3-3-6 - Intel 875P MoBo - Hitachi 80Gb SATA HDD - XP pro
    PowerColor 9700 Pro @ 355/652Mhz
    3DMark03: 5402
    AquaMark3 Tri-Score
    GFX: 5286
    CPU: 8723
    Overall: 40,575

  6. #206
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    154

    Default

    Whats this? I read that 5900u are scoring better than the 9800pro? I thought radeon was supposed to own nVidia.

    Btw Demon Keeler, I used to get 1800+ with my 4200Ti:D
    but that was seriously OC'd with an 80mm fan resting on the heatsink;)
    Main RiG:
    CPU: Athlon 64 3200+@2.17
    Mobo:Asus KT8V deluxe
    Ram:1Gig Corasair XMS PC-3200
    AGP: eVga GeForce 6800
    Case:Antec SLB
    HDD:Maxtor 80Gig 8mb
    PSU:Antec TRUE380

  7. #207
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Radicus
    Whats this? I read that 5900u are scoring better than the 9800pro? I thought radeon was supposed to own nVidia.

    Btw Demon Keeler, I used to get 1800+ with my 4200Ti:D
    but that was seriously OC'd with an 80mm fan resting on the heatsink;)
    Thats because things spread fast on the internet. Even though my card is very fast, the "general consensus" is that the Nvidia FX cards all suck and that ATI is vastly superior. At the moment yes, but not vastly. Its gotten to the point where even people that know nothing about hardware and are getting into it for the first time heard through the grapevine that they are bad cards...when they are really not as bad as they are cracked up to be.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  8. #208
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,393

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner
    Thats because things spread fast on the internet. Even though my card is very fast, the "general consensus" is that the Nvidia FX cards all suck and that ATI is vastly superior. At the moment yes, but not vastly. Its gotten to the point where even people that know nothing about hardware and are getting into it for the first time heard through the grapevine that they are bad cards...when they are really not as bad as they are cracked up to be.
    True, all my friends that know nothing about computer think that ATi are the best( not saying they are or not), and that nvidia suck ass, i believe both companies have there time to rule. But at the moment i prefer ati.
    CPU: Opteron 165 @ 311x9 - 2817.8 mhz - 1.47v
    Mobo: Abit KN8-SLI
    RAM: 2x512 Crucial Ballistic Tracers500 @ 202 mhz 2-2-2-5 T1
    GFX: Asus EAX1950pro @ 648/1408
    PSU: Thermaltake 500w
    SC: Audigy 2 zs
    LCD: 22' Samsung 225bw
    Speakers: Klipsch ProMedia 5.1 Ultra
    Mouse: Logitech G5

  9. #209

    Default

    Thats because things spread fast on the internet. Even though my card is very fast, the "general consensus" is that the Nvidia FX cards all suck and that ATI is vastly superior. At the moment yes, but not vastly. Its gotten to the point where even people that know nothing about hardware and are getting into it for the first time heard through the grapevine that they are bad cards...when they are really not as bad as they are cracked up to be.
    i agree with you there, but id say the fx5200 is an exception, i bought one and exchanged it for my r9200 within 2 days, in my opinion the performance was absolute crap. As for the rest of the fx cards ive never used them so i cant say.

  10. #210
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    Radicus: If you purchase a video card for the sole purpose of benchmarking, then Nvidia is the way to go.
    They are the leaders in benchmark optimisation (joke).

Page 21 of 39 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •