Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 9 of 39 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 384

Thread: 3DMark03 scores




  1. #81
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    5

    Default

    bad typing, doesn't have one

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    When posting your scores, could you all mention which motherboard, memory, processor, and
    graphics card you are using, this information could prove very helpful to other members when they consider upgrading in the future.

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    240

    Default

    I n0t1c3d th@t th3 sc0r3s d1ff3r gr3@t3ly fr0m 2001 @nd 2003 3dm@12k why 1s th1s?
    or1()n, u r t00 l337, d00d. =]



    :cool:
    - -+ r e v e n a n t +- -
    my rig: Shyznat
    * AMD XP 2600+ @2277 on an MSI K7N2-L * 2x 256meg Corsair PC3200 XMS Platinum in Dual Channel mode @ 3,2,1,2.0 * ATI Radeon 9700 Pro * 4x IBM 180GXP 60gig RAID 0+1 on a Promise Fastrack100 * 1x Western Digital WD800JB 80gig with 8mb buffer on mainboard IDE *Soundblaster Live! * Samsung SW-248B CDRW with 8mb buffer * Sony DDU1621 DVDR * Enermax EG465P-VE 431watt PSU * 23.1" Sceptre X23s-Naga LCD * Chieftech windowed case with glowing ide cables * pic1 * pic2 * pic3 * pic4 * pic5 * 9700 * 3Dmark03 5432 * 3Dmark2001SE 17K club member * the sweet spot *

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1

    Default

    I got 1200 with a:
    athlon 2400+ (@2205 mhz)
    Radeon 8500 LE (290/274)
    1 gig crucial pc2100
    newest omega drivers (as of early march)

    The cpu cost $100 and the radeon was $50 (yeah www.craigslist.org !) Can anyone beat that buget/score? Well, probably


    :cheers:

    Smithers

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    27

    Default

    ok i did the 3dmark03 on my computer and i got 2609 at first then i went to the website chat and they laughed at me cuz it was "Bad" heck i dunno anything about this stuff so i took that as bad but some guy gave me a driver website and i downloaded a catylist 3.1 and 3.2 but the 3.2 messed up my computer but anyways after installing the 3.1 i got a good jump from 2609 to 3901 and i dunno if thats good, this is what my computer is

    p4 2.4bghz
    2x512 pc2700 kingston ram non ecc
    soyo sy-p4x400 dragon lite board
    120 western digital 7500 rpm
    radeon 9500 pro
    windows xp pro
    direct x 9.0 (needed for 3dmark03 to get good score)

    so is that good???? i was told i could push 6k with the new drivers but i dunno but i guess i'll try again and post my score to you guys tomorrow night cuz its late and i need to get to bed cuz its 4 am

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    240

    Default

    I'd say that is right for your setup... You may be able to squeeze a few more points out of your card with the R350 driver mod. Check this tread for details.
    http://forums.tweaktown.com/showthre...&threadid=9552
    :cheers:
    - -+ r e v e n a n t +- -
    my rig: Shyznat
    * AMD XP 2600+ @2277 on an MSI K7N2-L * 2x 256meg Corsair PC3200 XMS Platinum in Dual Channel mode @ 3,2,1,2.0 * ATI Radeon 9700 Pro * 4x IBM 180GXP 60gig RAID 0+1 on a Promise Fastrack100 * 1x Western Digital WD800JB 80gig with 8mb buffer on mainboard IDE *Soundblaster Live! * Samsung SW-248B CDRW with 8mb buffer * Sony DDU1621 DVDR * Enermax EG465P-VE 431watt PSU * 23.1" Sceptre X23s-Naga LCD * Chieftech windowed case with glowing ide cables * pic1 * pic2 * pic3 * pic4 * pic5 * 9700 * 3Dmark03 5432 * 3Dmark2001SE 17K club member * the sweet spot *

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    X-bit has tested the following graphics cards using Futuremark's 3DMark03 benchmark program.

    Testbed

    Intel Pentium 4 2.8GHz CPU
    ASUS P4S8X (SiS648) mainboard
    512MB DDR333 SDRAM
    IBM DTLA 15GB, 7200rpm HDD
    Windows XP Professional SP1

    Cards tested

    ATi Radeon 9700 Pro 128MB
    ATi Radeon 9500 Pro 128MB
    ATi Radeon 9500 128MB
    ATi Radeon 9500 64MB
    ATi Radeon 9100 128MB
    ATi Radeon 9000 128MB
    Nvidia GeforceFX 5800 Ultra 128MB
    Nvidia Geforce4 Ti4800 128MB
    Nvidia Geforce4 Ti4600 128MB
    Nvidia Geforce4 Ti4200-8x 128MB
    Nvidia Geforce4 MX440-8x 64MB
    Nvidia Geforce3 Ti200 128MB
    SiS Xabre 600 64MB

    Drivers used

    ATi Catalyst 3.2 (.622)
    Nvidia Detonator 42.86
    Nvidia Detonator 42.68
    SiS Xminator 3.10.51
    SiS AGP Driver 1.14


    Read their article here >>

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by colmaca
    :cheers:

    Intel Celeron 1.2 GHz

    Arrrrrrr it won't put my score pic here it was 2262
    http://forums.tweaktown.com/attachme...;postid=126485
    <img src="http://forums.tweaktown.com/attachm...=&postid=126485">

    DirectX Info
    Version 9.0



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description RADEON 9700
    Manufacturer ATI Technologies Inc.
    Total Local Video Memory 256 MB
    Total Local Texture Memory 256 MB

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    :cheers: get some new **** next week http://www.giga-byte.com/products/8inxp.htm and a p4 3.06 to go with it it may up my score a Weeeeeeee bit ,(i hope it will

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1

    Default

    I don't get it :(

    My score is a whooping 230 :steam:

    Xp-prof
    Mainboard: ASUS A7V333
    cpu : athlon xp 2000+
    Mem : 1GB pc2700 333Mhz
    Videocard : Asus Geforce4 MX 440
    Directx : 9
    Latest nvidia en via drivers.

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Well, in your case, your video card is the limiting factor for your machine's "gaming performance" in a DX9 environment. Geforce cards lesser than the new FX series typically do not do well on 3Dmark03, well, or should I say that, actually, 3Dmark03 is not tailored for cards which do not support DX9 in hardware. The GF4 MX series are significantly less powerfull than the GF4 "ti" series cards, and those are significantly less powerfull than the Radeon 9700 Pro series cards. When I had my XP2100 CPU and GF4 ti4200 I was getting about 1500 on 3Dmark03. When got my 9700 Pro, my score jumped up to 4500+! So, you can see the difference having a card which supports DX9 in hardware makes for this test. Now I get 5400+ plus on that test; that's with an XP 2600+ CPU (OC'd to past XP3000 speeds), nForce2 mobo with dual channel DDR mem, and a 9700 Pro.

    I think a more fair test of your machine's abilities would be 3Dmark2001SE. Maybe give that one a go and see what you get.
    :cheers:
    - -+ r e v e n a n t +- -
    my rig: Shyznat
    * AMD XP 2600+ @2277 on an MSI K7N2-L * 2x 256meg Corsair PC3200 XMS Platinum in Dual Channel mode @ 3,2,1,2.0 * ATI Radeon 9700 Pro * 4x IBM 180GXP 60gig RAID 0+1 on a Promise Fastrack100 * 1x Western Digital WD800JB 80gig with 8mb buffer on mainboard IDE *Soundblaster Live! * Samsung SW-248B CDRW with 8mb buffer * Sony DDU1621 DVDR * Enermax EG465P-VE 431watt PSU * 23.1" Sceptre X23s-Naga LCD * Chieftech windowed case with glowing ide cables * pic1 * pic2 * pic3 * pic4 * pic5 * 9700 * 3Dmark03 5432 * 3Dmark2001SE 17K club member * the sweet spot *

Page 9 of 39 FirstFirst ... 789101119 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •