Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Help pushing past 184 BCLCK on UD5 + 920




  1. #11
    Lsdmeasap's Avatar
    Lsdmeasap is offline GIGABYTE Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    PCB Island
    Posts
    25,940

    Default Re: Help pushing past 184 BCLCK on UD5 + 920

    Try these changes and see if you can get 190x21 any easier, looks like you may not be trying enough voltages. Not sure though as you said you have tried alot? >>>

    Performance Enhance ...................... [TURBO] << Set standard

    Advanced Voltage Control:
    CPU
    Load Line Calibration ................. [ENABLED]
    CPU Vcore ..............................[1.33125] << Set 1.375
    QPI/VTT Voltage 1.150v .................[1.200] << Set 1.32-1.38
    CPU PLL 1.800v .........................[1.840]

    MCH/ICH
    PCIE 1.500v ...........................[1.500] << Set 1.54
    QPI PLL 1.100v ........................[1.200] << Set 1.24
    IOH Core 1.100v .......................[1.100] << Set 1.16-1.24
    ICH I/O 1.500v ........................[1.500] << Set 1.5
    ICH Core 1.1v .........................[1.100] << Set 1.14-1.18

    DRAM
    DRAM Voltage 1.500v ..............[1.660V] << Set 1.68-1.7

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    9

    Default Re: Help pushing past 184 BCLCK on UD5 + 920

    With the highest of each of those settings I got the following BSOD 0X00000124 after about 3 minutes of prime.

    Which you suggest is Incorrect QPI/Vtt Voltage (To Much/Not Enough)

    Maybe worth further playing around tomorrow night.

  3. #13
    Lsdmeasap's Avatar
    Lsdmeasap is offline GIGABYTE Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    PCB Island
    Posts
    25,940

    Default Re: Help pushing past 184 BCLCK on UD5 + 920

    Yeap, sounds like you need more QPI/VTT. You may also want to try more/less IOH at the same time as trying less first then more QPI/Vtt.

    But yeap, that code is always QPI/Vtt from all I have seen, normally meaning you need more but not always

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •