Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!

View Poll Results: What should I use?

Voters
6. This poll is closed
  • Onboard Realtek 8111D Dual Lan

    3 50.00%
  • Intel EXPI9301CTBLK 10/ 100/ 1000Mbps PCI-Express Network Adapter

    1 16.67%
  • Doesn't make a damn difference.

    2 33.33%
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Use onboard Realtek 8111D Lan or Intel Network Adapter?




  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    8

    Default Use onboard Realtek 8111D Lan or Intel Network Adapter?

    Hey all,

    Looking for some input. Should I use my onboard Realtek 8111D Dual Lan or Intel EXPI9301CTBLK 10/ 100/ 1000Mbps PCI-Express Network Adapter?

    I purchased the intel card when my ISP told my MB was causing the issues with internet, turns out they are idiots. Now I have a new rig. Is there any point to using the add-on card? Should I save myself the trouble of installing another driver and the 4-5 secs it adds to my cold boot?

    Let me know what you think.

    Trigeminal

    Silverstone FT02-B - GIGABYTE GA-X58A-UD5 - Core i7 930 - Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme-1366 RT Rev. C CPU Heatsink - Corsair 6GB (3 x 2GB) DDR3 1600 RAM @ 7-8-7-20 - SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 5850 - SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W Power Supply - OCZ Agility 2 120 GB SSD - Western Digital Black 750GB HDD - Western Digital Green 2TB HDD - Windows7 x64 - HP LP2465 24" S-PVA LCD @ 1920x1200

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    615

    Default Re: Use onboard Realtek 8111D Lan or Intel Network Adapter?

    I was in same position in past. I had weird disconnects and lags while gaming, but during normal work too. Bought extra Intel card and it was all good.
    On the other hand, on my current board I use the onboard Realtek without any problems. I still like the idea of dedicated network card for some reason, even though there is probably no point in it.

    By the way what the ISP told you is bull**** indeed, you don't have to be an expert to see they were simply lazy to investigate/fix their end ;P
    Oh and I don't think there would be any delay caused by additional drivers. That makes no sense. You would disable the onboard thing anyway.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NL
    Posts
    229

    Default Re: Use onboard Realtek 8111D Lan or Intel Network Adapter?

    Just use the onboard one, at least as long as you feel comfortable with it. If you think it's causing problems you can always add an other one. Sometimes NIC's (onboard or dedicated) can get broken in strange ways, but normally onboard should be fine.
    - Z68X-UD3H-B3(rev 1.3), bios F12
    - I5-2500k [3148C059], cooled by scythe mugen2 rev.b with 1500rpm pwm-fan on cpufan header.
    - 8G(2x4G) Corsair Vengeance LP CML8GX3M2A1600C9W,Low profile/Low voltage, DDR1600/C9-1.35v. Slots 1&2.
    - 16G(4x4G) Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 1333 @ 2133-c11. w1.55v

    - Seasonic M12D SS850-EM , 850W Semi-Modular PSU with 80A at 12V.
    - 2x EVGA GeForce GTX285-1GB in SLi, 4x 6pin power and bridge connected.[PCIEX_16 and PCIEX_8]
    - Hauppauge HVR2200 PCIE 1x tv-tuner card.[PCIEX1_3]
    - Intel controller in raid mode.
    - 2x WD 500G blacks in raid0 on intel port 0-1.
    - 1x WD 1000G black on intel port 2.
    - 1x OCZ Vertex2 (32nm) on intel port 3.
    - 1x Optiarc DVDRW on intel port 4.
    - 1x Samsung 500G on marvell port 0.
    - 24" LCD monitor @ Geforce 0, lower HDMI port.
    - 17" LCD monitor @ Geforce 0, upper HDMI port.
    - 19" LCD tv @ intel/onboard HDMI.
    - 4ch analoge speakers, cambridge dtt set.
    - internal spdif header connected to Geforce 0.
    - front usb connected.
    - front ac97 connected.
    - front cardreader (usb) connected.
    - rear 4x usb bracket.
    - ms media keyboard, ms comfort mouse. usb, wired.
    - w7x64-sp1.



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    J'Habite En Angleterre
    Posts
    2,431

    Default Re: Use onboard Realtek 8111D Lan or Intel Network Adapter?

    Any onboard solution probably won't be doing anything 100% in hardware. Most dedicated NIC cards will have the vast majority of their functions executed by the onboard I/O components.

    The question is, in this day of dual, quad, hexa-core CPU's sometimes OC'd to 4.8GHz and beyond (Sandy Bridge OC's nicely) is it really needed?

    I used a D-Link card for years and only stopped when I found I needed the PCI slot for my sound card. I've noticed no difference on my current board or on a EP45-UD3P. In fact, you'll notice much more difference quality wise getting rid of onboard sound that an onboard NIC. People may think onboard sound is fine, and so did I... until I listened to my games, CD's and films through decent hardware, not a codec IC.

    I'd keep it for troubleshooting purposes, or ebay it. I kept mine in my tool box.
    Coolermaster CM 690 II advance Case
    Corsair HX750 (CWT, 91%(80+ Gold rated @230V) single 62A 12V rail
    P55A-UD4 v2.0 @ F14
    Core i5 760 @ 20 x 201, 4.02GHz
    TRUE Black with a single Noctua NF-P12 pumping out 55 CFM @ 19db .
    2 x 2GB Mushkin Ridgeback (996902), @ 7-10-8-27, 2010-DDR, 1.66v
    2 x Gigabyte GTX 460 1024MB in SLI (Pre OC'd to 715MHz core and 1800MHz VRAM) @ 850 Core / 4100 Mem.
    Intel X25-M Boot Drive (OS and Programs) 200MB/s Read & 90MB/s Write
    Corsair X32 200MB/s Read & 100MB/s Write
    WD Caviar Blue 640GB C (Steam, Games, Storage, Temp Files & Folders, etc)
    Samsung F3 500GB Backup/Images
    Noctua 1300RPM 19dB case fan (rear extraction)
    3 x 140 MM Coolermaster LED fans (one front intake, one top extraction, one side intake)
    Dell Ultra Sharp 2209WAf E-IPS @ 1680x1050

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •