Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: Mushkin 996587 Memory Stability Testing and Review




  1. #31
    Lsdmeasap's Avatar
    Lsdmeasap is offline GIGABYTE Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    PCB Island
    Posts
    25,940

    Default Re: Mushkin 996587 Memory Stability Testing and Review

    Ahh sorry to hear you had to swtich brands, I wondered what happened with this.

    You could have RMA'd with Mushkin direct or did you try and not available for you in your area?

    The A-Data you got, while being a sound stable set may not be as overclockable or as good performance wise the Mushkin set you had so that is too bad to hear. But I know how things can be and the need for a stable system is a must, either way glad to hear you now have a stable setup.

    Thanks for posting back to let us know what happened. If you ever need help with things you know where to find us

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    33

    Default Re: Mushkin 996587 Memory Stability Testing and Review

    I'm trying to find out about RAID- in 1. can you put extra files/folders on just one disk- can one ext. HDD be turned off- do they both have to be on to read them & if so how do you know one disk has failed- on GA-EP45-UD3R can you setup disks you want to use, the raid level (0-10) or no raid at all? or can you tell me links where aI could find out, I've been fruitlessly Googling for hours but I obviously didn't know the right place to look.
    Thanks

  3. #33
    Lsdmeasap's Avatar
    Lsdmeasap is offline GIGABYTE Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    PCB Island
    Posts
    25,940

    Default Re: Mushkin 996587 Memory Stability Testing and Review

    All the info you ever need to know about RAID is here >>
    Single RAID Levels

    If one disk fails in RAID 1 the RAID ROM and or Intel Storage Manager would notify you to repair or replace it. As for running with 2-x and then only using one I think that would be ok as it would be the same as if one had died. But I am not sure how long or safe that would be.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •