Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: I Overclocked...Now What?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003


    3 gig pagefile is ENORMOUS. Virtual Memory is a LOT slower than RAM so keeping that to a minimum is ideal, however your RAM is slow too so you are kinda screwed there. Not to mention fragging your drive with a gigantic swap file.

    DDR would be a huge boost.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003


    ok, here's what CPU-Z 119a spit out for my comp info.

    Number of CPUs 1

    Code Name Willamette
    Specification Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1600MHz
    Family / Model / Stepping F 0 A
    Extended Family / Model 0 0
    Brand ID 8
    Technology 0.18 µ
    Supported Instructions Sets MMX, SSE, SSE2
    CPU Clock Speed 1594.8 MHz
    Clock multiplier x 16.0
    Front Side Bus Frequency 99.7 MHz
    Bus Speed 398.7 MHz
    L1 Data Cache 8 KBytes, 4-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
    L1 Trace Cache 12 Kµops, 8-way set associative
    L2 Cache 256 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
    L2 Speed 1594.8 MHz (Full)
    L2 Location On Chip
    L2 Data Prefetch Logic yes
    L2 Bus Width 256 bits

    Mainboard and chipset
    Motherboard manufacturer Intel Corporation
    Motherboard model D845WN , AAA64179-203
    BIOS vendor Intel Corp.
    BIOS revision HV84510A.86A.0050.P15.0305252001
    BIOS release date 05/25/2003
    Chipset Intel i845 rev. A3
    Southbridge Intel 82801BA (ICH2) rev. 12
    Sensor chip 5B5B

    AGP Status enabled, rev. 2.0
    AGP Data Transfert Rate 4x
    AGP Side Band Addressing supported, enabled
    AGP Aperture Size 256 MBytes

    DRAM Size 512 MBytes
    DRAM Frequency 132.9 MHz
    FSB:DRAM 3:4
    CAS# Latency 3.0 clocks
    RAS# to CAS# 3 clocks
    RAS# Precharge 3 clocks
    Cycle Time (TRAS) 6 clocks
    # of memory modules 1
    Module 0 SDRAM PC133 - 512 MBytes

    Windows version Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1 (Build 2600)

    guess it's time for a new mobo...

  3. #13


    what kind of problems r u haveing...? untill i get my p4 rig up im using this old ass p3 1ghz with 512 pc133... its got a ti4200 oc'd to 331/666 and i get 60-90fps on ut2k3 at 1280x1024 with all settings on max and anti off but trilliniar on, also i would have to agree that a 3gig page file is outragiouse, sometimes it might actualy slow ur system down, (this is the explination my mcse teach. gave me) ur system sees a PF(page file) as ram so it will load everything it can into ram, but if u have a small or no PF (i got none) then ur system might perform better., but ultimately a new mobo will help u out, might wana consider a new vid card too if its fps ur after...(im a nvidea guy myself) so id sugest a fx5900U or a ati 9800 pro, or if money is tight a regular 5900 provides about 10% less of the Ultras performance a fx5600ultras there pritty good, also there dx9, alast a 9700pro is a great card also.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2003


    i also have a 0.18 williamette with an intelboard, with 512 megs of pc133, and i can play all q3 based games with no problem and my gfx is a gf3! my swapfile is smaller though as i read u have 2 defrag ur pc like evry 5 mins if its 2 big :hammer:

    do you know if all williamettes are socket 423?? and what this "pinout" thing, first time i heard.


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003


    WTF!?!?!!?? 60-90 FPS???? I get like 25-30 at best. What other settings do you have that i might be able to use? any tweaks that i might be missing? i'm ocing to my card's max, vsync off, mipmap detail turned down, another setting in the nv drivers turned to performance...anti-aliasing turned off, bi-linear. hm...well, i guess my pos Albatron Ti4200P Turbo is a **** card that was way overpriced. Paid $180 for the damn thing.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2003


    60-90 fps? either you are lying or just dreaming, with that rig i doubt you got that high, so prove it with a screen.
    CPU: Opteron 165 @ 311x9 - 2817.8 mhz - 1.47v
    Mobo: Abit KN8-SLI
    RAM: 2x512 Crucial Ballistic Tracers500 @ 202 mhz 2-2-2-5 T1
    GFX: Asus EAX1950pro @ 648/1408
    PSU: Thermaltake 500w
    SC: Audigy 2 zs
    LCD: 22' Samsung 225bw
    Speakers: Klipsch ProMedia 5.1 Ultra
    Mouse: Logitech G5

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2003


    Quote Originally Posted by AsianBatman
    60-90 fps? either you are lying or just dreaming, with that rig i doubt you got that high, so prove it with a screen.
    Not possible on that CPU...not without lowest settings.


    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  8. #18


    ok well u want a screen, then u need to tell me how to post one, and i will. i have all the filtering OFF except triliniar, i have the nvidia lever on "performance" instead of quality, as i cant tell the differance with this **** monitor and half-ass card. and as i posted it was badly oc'd when i play, ill install the game again and make a screenie for u guys...

  9. #19


    p.s. i have a PNY card, i dont know about albatrons, but my PNY is very good for oc'ing as it has massive heatsinks

  10. #20


    ok just made a run on the game...hers my results, i guess i was overdoing it on my claims of 60-90 on 1280x1024, with everything on max and triliniar, but i ran it at 1024x768 with everything on "high" or "higher" settings with thriliniar, card oc'd to 289/671 anything higher crashed the system. as i mentioned, ****ty monitor so anso and fsaa dotn relly show a differance other then fps drop.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts