Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: I have NO idea where I got this info...




  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    1,369

    Default

    Here's a little bit of info I've found online....

    "Prescott CPUs will feature 800MHz Quad Pumped Bus, 1MB of L2 cache and the Hyper-Threading II technology in addition to new set of instructions known as PNI Prescott New Instructions. Apparently, the Prescott chips will live through 2004 and will be discontinued only in 2005. Implementation of 1066MHz Quad Pumped Bus and new Prescott B core to support the new PSB in early 2005. Tejas should come to the market in late 2004 or early 2005 and feature another set of new instructions (TNI, Tejas New Instructions) as well as new Hyper-Threading technology. Tejas chips will be shrunk to 65nm technology in late 2005 or early 2006 and receive 2MB of L2 cache and 1200MHz Quad Pumped Bus in addition to higher core-clock."

    "The "Prescott" core will deliver at least 5.20GHz using the 800MHz system bus. The immediate successor to Prescott after it tops out at 5.20GHz will be the "Tejas" core, also produced on a 90 nanometer process and delivering 5.60GHz using a 1066MHz system bus. That's slated to start appearing towards the end of 2004. Tejas will increase in steady increments which appear to be 6GHz, 6.40GHz, 6.80GHz, 7.20GHz, 7.60GHz, 7GHz, 8.40GHz, 8.80GHz and topping out at 9.20GHz.
    The first Nehalem is supposed to appear at 9.60GHz before Intel succeeds in its goal to produce a 10GHz+ chip, the Nehalem, and using a 1200MHz front side bus."

    Prescott 3.20GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 3.40GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 3.60GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 3.80GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 4.00GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 4.20GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 4.40GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 4.60GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 4.80GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 4.80GHz (1066MHz QPB)
    Prescott 5.00GHz (800MHz QPB)
    Prescott 5.06GHz (1066MHz QPB)
    Prescott 5.33GHz (1066MHz QPB)

    Tejas 5.33GHz (L2=1MB, 1066MHz QPB)
    Tejas 5.60GHz (L2=1MB, 1066MHz QPB)
    Tejas 5.86GHz (L2=1MB, 1066MHz QPB)
    Tejas 6.00GHz (L2=2MB, 1200MHz QPB)
    Tejas 6.13GHz (L2=1MB, 1066MHz QPB)
    Tejas 6.30GHz (L2=2MB, 1200MHz QPB)
    Tejas 6.60GHz (L2=2MB, 1200MHz QPB)
    Tejas 6.90GHz (L2=2MB, 1200MHz QPB)
    Tejas 7.20GHz (L2=2MB, 1200MHz QPB)
    SPAM Special Ops

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Isle of man
    Posts
    1,332

    Default

    I'm looking forward to 10 ghz:D
    What the fcuk happened to my sig?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,246

    Default

    i just gotta wonder what the average home user is going to do with that kind of power
    I've gone too far and need to move on!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    No where
    Posts
    445

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minibubba
    i just gotta wonder what the average home user is going to do with that kind of power
    Crunch more WU's :p

    But anyways, when have these companies been known to follow thier timelines? I would say push each of those up a year and then you have your timeline...:thumb:

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    i just gotta wonder what the average home user is going to do with that kind of power (10 Ghtz)
    -minibubba 2003

    --------------

    come on now, how new are you to computers. Just because technology 'seems' good right now, doesn't mean we don't have a use for continued reasearch. We don't have 'replicators' yet. And I hear they require a 266 terahertz processor minimum.

    --------------

    And just think, in 7 years we will have 100 Ghtz Machines.
    "In their capacity as a tool, computers will be but a ripple on the surface of our culture. In their capacity as intellectual challenge, they are without precedent in the cultural history of mankind." - Edsger Dijkstra

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,246

    Default

    lol, it just seems hard to picture that kind of power under the hood

    it's taken 3 yrs to go from 1 ghz to 3 ghz, 5 seems like a lot but not hard to picture...10 ghz on the other hand ...
    I've gone too far and need to move on!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    Remember, Computer components increase exponentially... So every 10 Months, capability DOUBLES. (this rate is expected to cease in 15-20 years, when the size of atoms become the limiting factor)

    I remember when it took 3 years to go from 100 Megahertz to 333 Megahertz.

    Now we are increasing by 233 megahertz every few months.
    "In their capacity as a tool, computers will be but a ripple on the surface of our culture. In their capacity as intellectual challenge, they are without precedent in the cultural history of mankind." - Edsger Dijkstra

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    caves of bedrock
    Posts
    3,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zeradul
    this rate is expected to cease in 15-20 years, when the size of atoms become the limiting factor
    i guess IBM is taking care of that. :thumb:
    Latest Microsoft Security Updates.
    Last Updated:
    10th MARCH


    If you are a security freak: Use Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (NT/2000/XP/2003)
    ======================
    icq : 203189004
    jabber : asklepios20@jabber.org
    =======================
    Linux user since: April 24, 2003 312478
    yabaa dabaa doo...
    Customized for 1024x768

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    1,369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asklepios
    i guess IBM is taking care of that. :thumb:
    Sweet ! With all the new tech coming out in the next several years, things are going to become a lot more like "Star Trek". ie: talking to computers and having them respond, etc...:group:
    SPAM Special Ops

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    1,369

    Default

    I don't remember where I got the info in the first post, but cudos to whomever I got it from !
    SPAM Special Ops

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •