Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: Will AMD go 333Mhz FSB????




  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    494

    Default

    damn..!!!, i didnt notice the 512..hmm, this oughta turn out very interesting

    or is it a fake?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aznx
    damn..!!!, i didnt notice the 512..hmm, this oughta turn out very interesting

    or is it a fake?
    Its fake...lol...i was just using my imagination and makin u all drool...but hey...who says it cant happen right...anywayz..take care..and thank for your opinions guys

    Lataz

    FiReBLaZR
    <img src="http://forums.tweaktown.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=163310">

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    Was a good effort though. ;)

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,377

    Default

    ... its still reasonable to think it was off an epox...

    *fades to corner not to be seen, annoyed he was wrong*

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JediAgent
    ... its still reasonable to think it was off an epox...

    *fades to corner not to be seen, annoyed he was wrong*
    Sorry JediAgent...let me get u a nick and fillerup...aight...lol...take care man...and hey...use some peltiers and overclock that epox biatch...lol...peace

    FiReBLaZR
    <img src="http://forums.tweaktown.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=163310">

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    What really gives it away is the CPU Type (and sometimes the Vendor String) as new ones give a different label there. ;)
    <center>:cheers:</center>

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggo
    What really gives it away is the CPU Type (and sometimes the Vendor String) as new ones give a different label there. ;)
    <center>:cheers:</center>
    Damn u wiggo....go to sleep...your ruining it for me man...lol...nah good lookin...take care man...have fun...get drunk...etc....peace

    FireBLaZR
    <img src="http://forums.tweaktown.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=163310">

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    Well it was a good joke just the same. ;)

    :cheers:

  9. #19

    Default

    Well when I was at ITComdex 2002 I spoke to AMD reps and they told me that 166Mhz FSB is on the cards but not yet

    the Tbread CPU will be 133FSB and Socket A. so all KT133A and above will be able to take full advantage of the Tbread
    Cameron Johnson
    Senior Hardware Reviewer
    TweakTown

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,910

    Default

    c

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •