Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Dissapointing Results of Athlon 64 with 64 Bit of Windows




  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mista K6
    The way AMD's 64-bit CPU's are (and will be) taking off in both 32-bit and 62-bit arenas, they def are the fastest, and we havent even hit socket-939 and dual channel capability yet :wow: . You can almost hear Intel's executives slamming there foreheads on their desks... :laugh: . : peace2: Mista K6
    When they go dual channel they are losing half of their cache to 512kb.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brisbane, Au.
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner
    When they go dual channel they are losing half of their cache to 512kb.
    Probably because that cache isn't free, and when they get socket939 and dual channel, AMD is betting that it will still be fast enough to entice users to them.......

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •