Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 102

Thread: 333 FBS Athlons 2700+ & 2800+




  1. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,514

    Default

    Aaah can't find it right now. But if I ever come across it again I'll get the link.
    New Sig soon, old one was way outdated.

    :thumb:

  2. #42
    Beefy Guest

    Default

    omg.. you're right:

    These are model numbers. AMD identifies the AMD Athlon XP processor using model numbers, as opposed to megahertz, such as the 2200+, 2100+, 2000+, 1900+, 1800+ and 1700+ versions. Model numbers are designed to communicate the relative application performance among the various AMD Athlon XP processors. The AMD Athlon XP processor 2200+ can outperform an Intel PentiumŪ 4 processor operating at 2.2GHz on a broad array of end-user applications.
    Originally they were telling people it's a comparison to their own chips. But I guess it's not now.. I concede. :)

    EDIT: actually, after looking at it, they mention that it can outperform, but they don't say it's a direct comparitive figure.. so i'll stick by my original statement. :)

  3. #43
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,489

    Default

    OK...thx for the info PGA and Beefy...i don;t care really i tell my pentium buddies that AMD still own their chips and the comparison numbers are based on Intel Pentium 6 chips (yes you saw it right..."six")
    - Damien

  4. #44
    Beefy Guest

    Default

    lol.. fair enough..

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    Yep Beffy got it right, AMD's PR system gives you what speed a Thunderbird would have to run at to perform at the same level. ;)
    <center>:cheers:</center>

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,514

    Default

    "But they do not always hit there mark" - I should have phrased that a bit better.

    I know that the rating used to compare the XP procs to the Thunderbirds. I just remember reading that thing about a 2200+ being equal to a 2.2ghz before...
    New Sig soon, old one was way outdated.

    :thumb:

  7. #47
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,489

    Default

    2200+ is prolly slighty better than the 2.2 in other words...its runs faster than it so inreality its a 2.3?
    - Damien

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,514

    Default

    Well the 2200+ runs at 1.8ghz but in my mind a 2200+ will kick a p4 2.8's @$$ anyday...
    New Sig soon, old one was way outdated.

    :thumb:

  9. #49
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,489

    Default

    and twice on Saturdays...:laugh:
    - Damien

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,514

    Default

    You got it :laugh:
    New Sig soon, old one was way outdated.

    :thumb:

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •