Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 93

Thread: amd vs intel article




  1. #81
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by [size=6
    asklepios[/size]]
    As the old sayin' goes that I use in these topics, Certain horses for certain courses
    so did anyone listen that statement? : omg:
    I don't think so somehow. :shrug:

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The__tweaker
    Yep + -50 bucks for some better cooling in order to manage that oc I assume.. ;)

    Well ya see same speed won't help because the lack of SSE2 instructions makes every XP quite slow in those apps compared to the P4 line of cpu's. And if you think It's B.S just because I mentioned it so ask someone else and they might explain to ya what SSE2 means.. :devil win

    How about you? Why don't you explain it to him. How about explaining it all of us for that matter.

    But while you're at it, you may want to check out these benchmarks from Tom's Hardware because all three of the ones I have below are for some form of video encoding/rendering. While he didn't include a 2.2GHz P4 in his lineup, I find it interesting that a 2.2GHz Athlon beat out a 2.4GHz+ P4 in all three tests. Geez.... in two of 'em a 1.8GHz Athlon beat out a 2.4GHz+ P4. In fact in the review a 2.2GHz Athlon beat a 2.4GHz+ P4 in 23 out of 27 benchmarks. And that's at least a 2.4GHz P4, in a lot of the benchmarks the 2.2GHz Athlon was beating 2.6GHz, 2.8GHz and 3GHz P4's. So don't try and tell me that a 2.2GHz P4 can hold it's own against a 2.2GHz Athlon........ I could probably count on one hand how many apps a P4 can beat an equally clocked Athlon. :p (By the way, I'm not what you would call a big fan of Tom's Hardware, but I went there because I knew he included a ton of CPUs in his review benchmarks.)



    DAS

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    Some ppl are never convinced and more just don't know when to give up tryin' to convince them either. :rolleyes2

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The__tweaker
    Yep + -50 bucks for some better cooling in order to manage that oc I assume.. ;)

    Well ya see same speed won't help because the lack of SSE2 instructions makes every XP quite slow in those apps compared to the P4 line of cpu's. And if you think It's B.S just because I mentioned it so ask someone else and they might explain to ya what SSE2 means.. :devil win

    again, what apps? and yes i know what sse2 is, duh. of course i could spout off about how AMD chips run 3dnow better than p4's do, the same result for the same reason. but it would be just as meaningless as what your saying.

    make your benchmark and post it, or as i said earlier, put up or shut up.

    and the 90 bucks was the cost of the chip, running with regular air cooling i already had.
    if truth is relative, then is it absolutely true that it is relative?

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    3,141

    Default

    Gee were ya bullied as a kid or something which made you forever hateful against the big boys aka Intel.. :rofl:

    Most people knows how big advantage P4's have over Xp's in SSE2 apps, this I know for a fact cause I own a 2100+ who ain't got mutch encoding power at all compared to the P4. But I guess you have both chips running those kinds of apps to so ya know exaktly what ya speaking about. ;)

    But again can't ya try hard and keep to this threads topic please which were the review on both companys new top chip. Or else this is going to be an endless "hate" aka flaming thread which leads nowere.. So please let us go back..

    Go back and read the review once again and this time try [i]really ****ing hard to understand it and then tell us WHO did actually win the test..??? : omg:

    Sorry but it's just so funny yet annoying to see how some people start to make shortcuts into other topics just because they can't defend their side within the main subject. But I have fate in ya, try extra hard this time and tell us who won the tests.

    And yeah as some seem to be *****ing about Q3 beeing Intel biased so I'll let ya count that part out and look at the rest of the tests. I know ya can do it just try ya hardest.. Good luck..

    Know let's see if ya man enough to stay on topic this time instead of chicken out.. :devil win

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The__tweaker
    Gee were ya bullied as a kid or something which made you forever hateful against the big boys aka Intel.. :rofl:

    Most people knows how big advantage P4's have over Xp's in SSE2 apps, this I know for a fact cause I own a 2100+ who ain't got mutch encoding power at all compared to the P4. But I guess you have both chips running those kinds of apps to so ya know exaktly what ya speaking about. ;)

    But again can't ya try hard and keep to this threads topic please which were the review on both companys new top chip. Or else this is going to be an endless "hate" aka flaming thread which leads nowere.. So please let us go back..

    Go back and read the review once again and this time try really ****ing hard to understand it and then tell us WHO did actually win the test..??? : omg:

    Sorry but it's just so funny yet annoying to see how some people start to make shortcuts into other topics just because they can't defend their side within the main subject. But I have fate in ya, try extra hard this time and tell us who won the tests.

    And yeah as some seem to be *****ing about Q3 beeing Intel biased so I'll let ya count that part out and look at the rest of the tests. I know ya can do it just try ya hardest.. Good luck..

    Know let's see if ya man enough to stay on topic this time instead of chicken out.. :devil win
    Hmmmmm..... what's the matter? Can't take the heat so you keep trying to divert the conversation by accusing us of not being on topic? Well, the last time I read the review it was about "Intel 3.2GHz P4 vs. AMD Athlon XP 3200+" and that is exactly what the topic of our conversation has been! Intel vs. AMD!
    DAS

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    caves of bedrock
    Posts
    3,129

    Default

    Originally posted by das9092
    [BIn fact in the review a 2.2GHz Athlon beat a 2.4GHz+ P4 in 23 out of 27 benchmarks.
    now here is something from the conclusion page to the review you linked to

    [b]In our extensive benchmark tests, the P4 is always in the lead - we talked about this in our last article High-Flying: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Squares Off Against Intel P4 3 GHz. To be fair, it must be said that AMD offers a good performance/ price ratio with its Athlon processors, but it still cannot quite keep up with the Intel CPUs.
    my god what kind of a moron are you anyways?
    i m lmao on the thought that u r telling us that AMD is better than Intel and linking us to a review which has a conclusion page like this : omg:

    again that review proves Wiggo's point but then who is listening.
    Latest Microsoft Security Updates.
    Last Updated:
    10th MARCH


    If you are a security freak: Use Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (NT/2000/XP/2003)
    ======================
    icq : 203189004
    jabber : asklepios20@jabber.org
    =======================
    Linux user since: April 24, 2003 312478
    yabaa dabaa doo...
    Customized for 1024x768

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asklepios
    now here is something from the conclusion page to the review you linked to



    my god what kind of a moron are you anyways?
    i m lmao on the thought that u r telling us that AMD is better than Intel and linking us to a review which has a conclusion page like this : omg:

    again that review proves Wiggo's point but then who is listening.
    Well because you felt the need to call me a moron, I'll explain to you how much of a moron you are and how much you didn't listen!

    1) I didn't say that the Athlon came out on top in that review!

    2) I pointed out that a 2.2GHz Athlon beat a 2.4GHz P4 in 23 out of 27 benchmarks in that review!

    3) I pointed this out because tweaker said his 2.26GHz P4 could out pace a 2.2GHz Athlon in video encoding/rendering apps. To which I showed that in three of the video encoding/rendering tests that THG did, a P4 could not out pace an equally clocked Athlon.

    4) The fact remains that the only way a P4 can ever out pace an Athlon in 85% of the apps out there is through shear brute force clock speed. If this review had been about a 3.2GHz Athlon vs. 3.2GHz P4 how do you think the P4 would look then? It would probably be owned in almost everything!

    5) But as we all know, this is the Ackley’s heal for the Athlon, its inability to clock as high or higher than a P4. But did Intel try to cheat us by making the P4 core less efficient for the sack of clock speed or did they have a vision that a sacrifice was needed to obtain higher clock speeds? I leave that judgment up to everyone else..........
    DAS

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    4,825

    Default

    All right folks, the flames can stop right now or this post will... your call. I'm getting tired of the bickering and name calling. It is getting old and accomplishes nothing productive. If you have a problem with that, feel free to email me. I'll call you names to your heart's content. :rolleyes2
    Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill
    My Toys

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    3,141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asklepios
    my god what kind of a moron are you anyways?
    i m lmao on the thought that u r telling us that AMD is better than Intel and linking us to a review which has a conclusion page like this : omg:
    LOL I second that m8, hovewer I agree to Darth post, let's stop this as it's no point to argue

    [Edit]
    I have deleted the remainder of the post because some don't know how to listen to a hint. Let us hope that I don't have to be more direct in my problem-solving methods.

    Darth

    [/Edit]

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •