Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Sapphire Radeon X1950GT - Testing 256MB vs. 512MB memory




  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TweakTown Forum
    Posts
    5,582

    Default Sapphire Radeon X1950GT - Testing 256MB vs. 512MB memory

    Please feel free to comment about our story entitled "Sapphire Radeon X1950GT - Testing 256MB vs. 512MB memory"

  2. Default Re: Sapphire Radeon X1950GT - Testing 256MB vs. 512MB memory

    It's very professional, that's for sure. I wanted to pick between a 256MB and a 512MB X1950GT, and this really helped me make up my mind.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Shumen, Bulgaria
    Posts
    2

    Default Computer configuration???

    Hi! I've read the whole review and I didn't find out what is your testing hardware... I'm asking because I own:

    ASUS M2N-E SLI | AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @2610mhz | Saphire Radeon X1950GT 256MB DDR3 @614/1404| 2x 512 DDR2-667 A-DATA | Hitachi DESKSTAR 160GB T7K160 SATA2 8MB + 320GB T7K500 SATA2 16MB | FOXCONN 3GTLA +570A [+ 2x Foxconn 80mm] | ISO 350W | LCD Philips 190C 19"

    And my best results in 3dMark05 and 06 are:

    05 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3497490

    06 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3326965

    And is a lot way back instead yours... but my videocard is clocked... I will
    be very thankful, for telling me how to pump up my score to maximum...

    And one more question... If sombody have XPERT VISION X1950GT 512mb 256bit?
    Please tell me is it good? Is it clocks very well?
    Last edited by pecuna; 10-10-2007 at 11:48 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Central Alberta , Canada
    Posts
    1,019

    Default Re: Sapphire Radeon X1950GT - Testing 256MB vs. 512MB memory

    See page 4 of that review. Sorry to say but you are nowhere near the class of hardware used in that review and will not be able to come close to those benchmarks no matter what you do to your software.
    Antec 900 case (4 120mm and 1 200mm lighted fans + UFO flashing light set + 2 12" and 1 6" Mutant Mods meteor lights) - Aerogate ll thermal controller - Asus M2N-e SLI - AMD 64 X2 AM2 6400+ - Corsair TX650 PSU - MSI 450GTS Cyclone OC - 2 X 2GB Patriot Extreme Performance PC2 6400 RAM - SATA 320 GB Seagate HD, SATA 300GB Maxtor HD and IDE 80 GB Samsung HD - Floppy Drive/Card Reader Combo - LG SuperMulti Lightscribe 18x DVD RW - Plextor PX-716A DVD r/rw - Windows 7 Home Premium 64

    Crude but Effective ... it is a way of life.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Shumen, Bulgaria
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: Sapphire Radeon X1950GT - Testing 256MB vs. 512MB memory

    Quote Originally Posted by PrairieDawg View Post
    See page 4 of that review. Sorry to say but you are nowhere near the class of hardware used in that review and will not be able to come close to those benchmarks no matter what you do to your software.
    10x! Openly I'd scrolldown to the result without seeing this...
    I wanna ask what is the psu of this computer? And why their cards achieved only 610/1350 ? In my computer I've overcloked my Sapphire Radeon X1950GT 256mb to 614/1404 and I'm with the stock cooler and the temperature is the same as in default settings... And could s.o. post the real results of the card the
    SM2.0 Score and HDR/SM3.0 Score beacause the cpu is giving a lot marks?

    There's mine:
    3DMark Score - 4139 3DMarks
    SM2.0 Score - 1782
    HDR/SM3.0 Score 2025
    CPU Score - 953
    Last edited by pecuna; 10-10-2007 at 11:54 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •