Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Problem with Soyo P4S 645DX Dragon Ultra Review?




  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4

    Default

    The review mentioned several times that the 645DX Ultra didn't have the 961B southbridge or ATA-133 support. However, assuming the board pictures on page 3 of the review are from the board actually reviewed, the fourth picture down clearly shows the 961 southbridge is stepping B0, i.e. a 961B.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Good point. I saw this too and was just going to remark on the fact that the pictures of this mobo in this review, at least, appear to be from the actual SY-P4S-645DX DRAGON Ultra, which does have the 961B chipset.

    I'm a bit confused by this.

    Thera

    :confused:

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4

    Default

    All shipping 645DX boards should have the 961B. The only 645DX boards I know of that didn't have it were some pre-release boards (MSI, I think) that were floating around.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    New England Highlands, Australia
    Posts
    21,907

    Default

    Really this should be in the Publication Discussion forum so I'll just move it there. :smokin:
    <center>:cheers:</center>

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Another weird review of this board popped up down under at tweakers.com.au

    http://www.tweakers.com.au/articles/...45dx/page2.asp

    They also describe their board as having the older 961 southbridge:

    "Since SOYO decided to use the older SiS961 southbridge instead of the newer 961B or 962 chipset, the onboard USB is only 1.1 compliant being the reason for the USB 2.0 PCI card inclusion."

    Yet the picture of the southbridge, though blurred, seems to be of the 961B as well (at least to my inexpert eyes).

    http://www.tweakers.com.au/articles/...45dx/south.jpg

    So have all the review sites been reviewing prelease versions of this board? I have visions of Soyo passing around one older version of the board from reviewer to reviewer.

    Thera

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4

    Default

    This IS getting really odd. Either:

    1) Sites are taking pictures of one board and reviewing another (in which case the reviewer should mention that the board pictured isn't the board reviewed), or

    2) Reviewers are using canned/cut 'n' paste statements from previous reviews. I've seen examples of this all over the place, especially when you're looking at boards with incremental changes, like swapping out the 645/961A for a 645DX/961B.

    BTW, Wiggo, thanks for the move. A suggestion - you guys might consider renaming "Publication Discussion" to something a little easier to catch, like "Article/Review Discussion." Just a thought.

  7. #7
    Beefy Guest

    Default

    Or it could be that they are actually using a pre-release version of the board, which is different to the final release. It has happened before. And if it's popping up over multiple sites, then I'm doubting whether it's a reviewer error...

    And Publication Discussion is a good title. Articles / reviews / guides are all publications by the site.. :)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Or it could be that they are actually using a pre-release version of the board

    If both reviewers were reviewing a pre-release board then where did the board with the 961B in both reviews' screenshots come from? The pictures in both reviews aren't the same, and they definitely don't look like press shots from Soyo.

    Plus if it's pre-release the review should state that explicitly, since things can obviously change before release. I'm not sure how long the review took, but a little over 3 weeks before the review was published, Soyo's press release announcing the P4S-645DX Dragon Ultra stated:

    The board also includes two PCI bus mastering ATA133 E-IDE ports, and an Ultra DMA 66/100/133 IDE port, which supports four independent channels to accommodate eight IDE devices, including two for RAID.
    At the minimum, the apparent absence of the 961B on the review board plus the observation of the 961B on the board whose picture was taken should have prompted a call to Soyo asking whether production boards would have the 961B or not. Both reviews leave the impression that the board doesn't have it, period.

    I'm not trying to being a harda$$ about it, but these kinds of inaccuracies don't reflect fairly on the chipset.

    Articles / reviews / guides are all publications by the site

    True, but what's technically accurate and what's user-friendly aren't necesarily the same thing. How about "Article/Review/Guide Discussion?" :D

  9. #9
    Beefy Guest

    Default

    OK, I'm seeing what you are talking about now.. :) I just saw the Tweakers review of the board. Looks like it was a mistake by the reviewer in both cases. The Soyo site even says it's a 961B chipset.

    I'm guessing that they just looked at the chip itself, didn't notice the B0 in the bottom corner and assumed it was only a 961.. i guess..

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Having had problems with Soyo's P4S, I called SOYO
    to verify this very question.
    Their Tech Support checked with Manufac and said
    that the 645DX mobo is using a 961 NOT a 961B,
    but as others have pointed out, the photos clearly
    show a 'B0' on the chip and SOYO specs state a 961B.

    No standards in chip labels means they are free to concat
    numbers all over the chip into one number that will confuse
    even their own peoples.

    I'll post again in the Hardware/Motherboards forum if I get
    another answer from SOYO... I figure I'll get 3 answers and
    then average them into some kinda reality. :p
    Optimal

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •