Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47

Thread: NVIDIA GeForce FX is the graphics processor of choice at E3




  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    319

    Default

    Okay in the appreciation of spam how should i reply to that message? I would have just written LOL cause its funny but i have nothing more to add to that subject? So do i do that or just not show any appreciatation for beefys comment?!! :confused:

    ta ta

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    1,369

    Default

    :rofl: hehehehehehe....................

    EDIT: I'm gonna say out of this.
    SPAM Special Ops

  3. #23
    Beefy Guest

    Default

    How about we just drop it all and continue with the actual topic here...

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    845

    Default

    I'm impressed by NVIDIA it might be their time to catch up...also would a AMD running at 2.5GHZ outpreform a 3.0GHZ Intel?
    The one thing man learns from history is that man does not learn from history.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    3,141

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by t00lb0x
    Would a AMD running at 2.5GHZ outpreform a 3.0GHZ Intel?
    Well maybe not in sse2/hyperthread tasks but otherwise, yes I think it could..
    But they aren't there by far yet..

    And Intel ain't staying to long at 3 ghz, their 3.2 ghz cpu is actually just around the corner..

    :cheers:

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    845

    Default

    Yo how do you get the Performance Rating of a AMD --what does IPC stand for (Wiggo used it...)
    The one thing man learns from history is that man does not learn from history.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Lancaster
    Posts
    319

    Default

    So how would a 2.5GHz AMD out perform a 3GHz intel? Is it something to do with the chip structure? Or in the design?!!

    ta ta

  8. #28
    Beefy Guest

    Default

    The chips go about performing their functions in different ways and using different instructions. It's a long and complicated explination, so if you are curious, just have a look around the net. There's plenty of articles around about it.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    845

    Default

    Basically how Intel works, the reason why it is called Pentium 4 is because it is Quadpumped which means for each cycle it will transfer four times. DDR ram (dual data rate) travles on both the up and the down, but I am not sure how the P4 does; I just know it does it 4 times per cycle. Now, it can do so many transfers it takes less data on each cycle so it needs higher MHZ to run faster. AMD, I don't know how specifically they work. I know Macintosh go once or twice (depending on processor) per cycle. If you have more questions just ask...hope this helps
    The one thing man learns from history is that man does not learn from history.

  10. #30
    Beefy Guest

    Default

    Hehehe.. that's a new one..

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •