Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: ATI vs Nvidia AOD DX9 Benchmarks




  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Dave Baumann at Beyond 3D sends word that they have posted a mini review which looks at PS2.0 DX9 functionality!

    Reverend introduced a new benchmark to B3D recently, being Tomb Raider: Angel Of Darkness. The importance of this benchmark is that it is the first to full utilise PS2.0 DX9 functionality within a gaming environment.

    To gain an understanding of the relative performances of DX9 boards we have a short article comparing the performances of the 5200 Ultra, 5600 Ultra, 9500, 9600 PRO and at the high end the 5800 Ultra, 5900 Ultra, 9700 PRO and 9800 PRO.

    ATI vs Nvidia AOD DX9 Benchmarks

    http://www.beyond3d.com/misc/traod_dx9perf/ :flames:

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    As I understand it, Direct X9 is not fully implemented in AOD, which has proved such a disappointment, that Tomb Raider owner and publisher EIDOS has transferred development from their Core Studio in the UK to their Crystal Dynamics Studio in America.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,790

    Default

    That has got to be the most BS filled set of benchmarks I have ever seen...

    My card runs right next to every 9800Pro I have ever seen...and I have seen a lot of benchmarks and 3dmarks.

    I have that game...and I don't experience those problems.

    FX5900 - 3DMark2001 [20,566] - 3DMark2003 [7,281] - Aquamark3 [56,694]
    Ti4400 - 3DMark2001 [16,028]

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •