Please report all spam threads, posts and suspicious members. We receive spam notifications and will take immediate action!
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: GeForce 2 MX 200 Overclocking




  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Morgan, what do u think can be holding me down????

    I would appreciate any suggestion from anyone as well... :confused:
    [Taaroa Waimea]
    MSI K3T Ultra (VIA KT333)
    AMD AthlonXP 1500+
    Micron PC2100 256Mb DDR RAM CL2
    GF3Ti200@stock
    Detonator 30.82
    Western Digital ATA66 9.3Gb
    ALC650 sound
    LG CD-RW 16x10x40x
    "La educación no es más que el entendimiento progresivo de la ignorancia"

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Hummm......
    I didn´t read your post right at first, you say you get around 3000 3dmarks at 1024x768x16 in 3DMark2001....
    I get now (after updating my drivers from 21.81 to 28.32, tweaking my RAM and updating to the latest 4-in-1) around 1700 3dmarks at 1024x768x32 in 3DMark2001SE, and 2500 in 1024x768x16... taking into account that your vram is DDR and has 128bit bus and were OCed 30 Mhz more than mine (plus 50+ Mhz in your CPU) and you were running in 16 instead of 32 bits color i think my scores DON´T suck....:devil: jejej... you really made me worry!!!
    thanx anyway....
    [Taaroa Waimea]
    MSI K3T Ultra (VIA KT333)
    AMD AthlonXP 1500+
    Micron PC2100 256Mb DDR RAM CL2
    GF3Ti200@stock
    Detonator 30.82
    Western Digital ATA66 9.3Gb
    ALC650 sound
    LG CD-RW 16x10x40x
    "La educación no es más que el entendimiento progresivo de la ignorancia"

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    1,297

    Default

    My MX did not have DDR. It uses SDR SDRAM. I think Creative was the only one to use DDR in an MX card.

    I'm really starting to question the MX200 you say you have, cuz the one I briefly had was really no faster than a Voodoo 3 3000AGP at stock speeds:eek:

    Also, the test taken were awhile back and under Win2k. I'd run them now, but the parts in question power my file server--which I'm leaving alone.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1,166

    Default

    Yeah.....mx200's suck hard
    <Insert Witty Comment Here.>

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    1,297

    Default

    NVidia went overboard there...:scream:


    *yaaay, SILVER TWEAKER

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan_Lander
    I'm really starting to question the MX200 you say you have, cuz the one I briefly had was really no faster than a Voodoo 3 3000AGP at stock speeds:eek:
    what do u mean?:confused: the scores i got (1700 and 250) were with the card OCed to 210/180....

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    1,297

    Default

    I'm talking at stock speeds, plus the fact that I never could install 3dMark 2001 with a Voodoo 3 in--wasn't compatible with DX8 stuff, so the install quit. Until I got my GF3, that Voodoo 3 was pretty fast in Unreal and UT (since the engine was built with 3Dfx chips in mind)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •